With dozens in limbo, Den‎mark pressured to reverse re‎fu‎ge‎e policy

12 comments
  1. Small reminder that Al-Jazeera should be viewed with as much trust and credibility as other state-linked media such as Sputnik, Russia Today or Global Times

  2. Imagine removing refugees who are working and paying their tax just to put them indefinitely in a detention center making the Danish tax payer pay for them, and basically removing them from society all together.

    I wouldn’t want to be in a situation where, I have to live the rest of my life in a prison separated from my family. We European love to laugh at the US and call them racist for separating kids at the border, yet we are happy doing evil shit like this that would make the most hard-core evangelican GOP wet themselves with joy.

  3. Refuge (n) *Old Fr* — a **temporary** home for people in need of shelter or protection.

    Refuge claims are just that — temporary. It is a temporary safe port in the storm until the danger has passed. Once the harm is no longer manifest, then the asylum ends and the refugee becomes one on a long list of would-be immigrants, and must apply and meet the same standards as other potential emigres.

    This isn’t hard. “Refugee” doesn’t mean “shortcut the immigration system in perpetuity”

  4. Why Al-Jazeera doesn’t write about how Qatar should help some brotherly migrants and take them in?

Leave a Reply