Track your investments for FREE with Simply Wall St, the portfolio command center trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide.
The White House has directed U.S. agencies to deploy nuclear reactors for space use, targeting operations in orbit by 2028 and on the Moon by 2030.
This new federal initiative formally brings nuclear power into future space infrastructure plans.
NuScale Power (NYSE:SMR), the only SMR developer with U.S. NRC design approval, is now a direct contender for related government contracts.
NuScale Power enters this new policy push with a share price of $11.41 and a mixed recent track record. The stock is up 22.7% over the past week, while returns over the past year and year to date show declines of 21.9% and 30.0% respectively. Over a 3-year period, the stock return is 30.0%, with a 5-year return of 14.1%.
For investors watching NYSE:SMR, the move into potential space applications introduces a fresh angle beyond conventional grid power. The federal focus on space reactors could broaden how the company is assessed, with future developments likely to hinge on contract awards, technical fit for space use, and NuScale’s ability to adapt its SMR designs to non-terrestrial environments.
Stay updated on the most important news stories for NuScale Power by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on NuScale Power.
NYSE:SMR Earnings & Revenue Growth as at Apr 2026
We’ve flagged 3 risks for NuScale Power. See which could impact your investment.
The U.S. space nuclear initiative effectively opens a new potential use case for NuScale Power’s small modular reactors, moving the conversation beyond terrestrial grids into power for satellites, lunar bases and defense applications. Because NASA and the Pentagon plan to run competitive vendor processes, NuScale is unlikely to be the only contender, but its existing U.S. NRC-approved design could shorten qualification steps relative to peers that are earlier in development. For investors, the key question is whether NuScale can adapt its SMR technology to space-specific requirements, such as lower mass, radiation-hardened systems and autonomous operation, within the timelines targeted for late 2020s deployment. The opportunity also brings execution and funding questions, as space reactors may require new partnerships, bespoke engineering and potentially different regulatory pathways from NuScale’s current commercial projects. Overall, the news adds another potential revenue stream and reinforces the role of nuclear in future infrastructure, but it does not change the near term reality that NuScale is still working to convert its pipeline into built and operating reactors.
