Ashraf, J. & Javed, A. Food security and environmental degradation: Do institutional quality and human capital make a difference?. J. Environ. Manage. 331, 117330 (2023).
Wang, Y., Yuan, Z. & Tang, Y. Enhancing food security and environmental sustainability: A critical review of food loss and waste management. Resour. Environ. Sustain. 4, 100023 (2021).
Ladha-Sabur, A., Bakalis, S., Fryer, P. J. & Lopez-Quiroga, E. Mapping energy consumption in food manufacturing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 86, 270–280 (2019).
Çamkaya, S., Kaya, Y., Brika, S. K., Barut, A. & Ali, K. Do Fossil Fuel Consumption, Eco-Friendly Technology and Financial Development Have an Impact on Environmental Quality Under the LCC Hypothesis? Evidence From E‐7 Countries. Geological Journal. (2025).
Karaaslan, A. & Camkaya, S. The relationship between CO2 emissions, economic growth, health expenditure, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew. Energy. 190, 457–466 (2022).
Liu, T., Wang, H. Z., Wang, H. Z. & Xu, H. The spatiotemporal evolution of ecological security in China based on the ecological footprint model with localization of parameters. Ecol. Indic. 126, 107636 (2021).
Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. How much of global greenhouse gas emissions come from food? (Our World in Data, 2024).
Sharma, G. D., Shah, M. I., Shahzad, U., Jain, M. & Chopra, R. Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators. J. Environ. Manage. 297, 113316 (2021).
Yirong, Q. Does environmental policy stringency reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from high-polluted economies. J. Clean. Prod. 341, 130648 (2022).
Jiang, C., Wang, Y., Yang, Z. & Zhao, Y. Do adaptive policy adjustments deliver ecosystem-agriculture-economy co-benefits in land degradation neutrality efforts? Evidence from southeast coast of China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 195 (10), 1215 (2023).
Ahmed, K. Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries. J. Environ. Manage. 274, 111209 (2020).
Aydin, M. & Bozatli, O. The effects of green innovation, environmental taxes, and financial development on renewable energy consumption in OECD countries. Energy 280, 128105 (2023).
Kilinc-Ata, N., Camkaya, S. & Topal, S. What role do foreign direct investment and technology play in shaping the impact on environmental sustainability in newly industrialized countries (NIC)? New evidence from wavelet quantile regression. Sustainability 17 (11), 4966 (2025).
Infante-Amate, J., Travieso, E. & Aguilera, E. Unsustainable prosperity? Decoupling wellbeing, economic growth, and greenhouse gas emissions over the past 150 years. World Dev. 184, 106754 (2024).
Cui, L., Yue, S., Nghiem, X. H. & Duan, M. Exploring the risk and economic vulnerability of global energy supply chain interruption in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war. Resour. Policy 81, 103373 (2023).
Li, C., Zhang, W., Huang, X. & Zhang, J. F. Geopolitical risks, institutional environment, and food price inflation. Appl. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2386853 (2024).
Nguyen, D. T., Le, T. H., Do, D. D. & Nguyen, H. N. Does geopolitical risk hinder sustainable development goals? Evidence from a panel analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 347, 119204 (2023).
Liu, S., Jiang, R., Liu, L. & Chan, F. T. A hybrid method combining three-way decision and DEA game cross-efficiency for procurement mode selection in contract farming. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102336 (2025).
Xie, X. et al. Measuring and enhancing food security resilience in China under climate change. Systems 13(12), 1054 (2025).
Jin, H., Tsai, F. S. & Martinez-Vazquez, J. Optimal expenditure decentralization for sustainable development: evidence from a 52-country panel analysis. Financial Innov. 11 (1), 111 (2025).
Porter, M. America’s green strategy. Bus. environment: Read. 33, 1072 (1996).
Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9(4), 97–118 (1995).
Elahi, E., Khalid, Z. & Zhang, Z. Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture. Appl. Energy 309, 118459 (2022).
Sahu, S. & Arya, S. K. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture and food processing through sustainable management practices for climate change. In Advances and Technology Development in Greenhouse Gases: Emission, Capture and Conversion (71–96). Elsevier. (2024).
Majeed, Y. et al. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Rep. 10, 344–359 (2023).
Gliessman, S. R. Package price agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems (CRC, 2021).
OECD. Environmental Policy Stringency Index. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/measuring-environmental-policy-stringency-in-oecd-countries_90ab82e8-en.html
Osman, M., Schwartz, P. & Wodak, S. Sustainable consumption: What works best, carbon taxes, subsidies and/or nudges?. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43(3), 169–194 (2021).
Ahmad, M., Li, X. F. & Wu, Q. Carbon taxes and emission trading systems: Which one is more effective in reducing carbon emissions? A meta-analysis. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143761 (2024).
Li, Z. et al. Integration of renewable energy, environmental policy stringency, and climate technologies in realizing environmental sustainability: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Energy 196, 1376–1384 (2022).
Christoph, B., Schneider, J. & Emmanuel, A. O. Trade in carbon and carbon tariffs. Environ. Resource Econ. 78 (4), 669–708 (2021).
Klenert, D. et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8(8), 669–677 (2018).
Rehman, A., Ma, H., Ozturk, I. & Radulescu, M. Revealing the dynamic effects of fossil fuel energy, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and carbon emissions on Pakistan’s economic growth. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 (32), 48784–48794 (2022).
Zakeri, B. et al. Pandemic, war, and global energy transitions. Energies 15 (17), 6114 (2022).
Aswani, R. S. & Sajith, S. Cooperative Sustainable Development: A Geostrategic Band-Aid to Energy Insecurity (Springer Nature, 2024).
Sovacool, B. K., Martiskainen, M., Hook, A. & Baker, L. Decarbonization and its discontents: A critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions. Clim. Change 155, 581–619 (2019).
World Bank. World Development Indicators (World Bank, 2023).
York University Ecological Footprint Initiative & Global Footprint Network. National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts. (2023). Retrieved from https://data.footprintnetwork.org
OECD. Environmental policy: Environmental Policy Stringency index. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/data/oecd-environment-statistics/environmental-policy-stringency-index_2bc0bb80-en
EIA. Canada country data on total energy consumption. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/country/CAN
Caldara, D. & Iacoviello, M. Measuring geopolitical risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 112 (4), 1194–1225 (2022).
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 (2001).
Jordan, S. & Philips, A. Q. Cointegration testing and dynamic simulations of autoregressive distributed lag models. Stata J. 18(4), 902–923 (2018).
Çelik, A. & Özırmak, M. Understanding the association between Bitcoin mining and environmental sustainability in light of the Sustainable Development Goals through the DARDL and KRLS methods. Sustain. Dev. 33(5), 6505–6527 (2025).
Lin, B. & Ullah, S. Modeling the impacts of changes in nuclear energy, natural gas, and coal in the environment through the novel DARDL approach. Energy 287, 129572 (2024).
Kripfganz, S. & Schneider, D. C. Response surface regressions for critical value bounds and approximate p-values in equilibrium correction models 1. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 82(6), 1456–1481 (2020).
Hainmueller, J. & Hazlett, C. KRLS: Kernel-based Regularized Least squares (KRLS). R package version 0.3-7 (2014). R-project. org/package= KRLS.
Sarkodie, S. A. & Owusu, P. A. How to apply the novel dynamic ARDL simulations (dynardl) and kernel-based regularized least squares (krls). MethodsX 7, 101160 (2020).
Sun, C., Xia, E., Huang, J. & Tong, H. Coupled coordination and pathway analysis of food security and carbon emission efficiency under climate-smart agriculture orientation. Sci. Total Environ. 948, 174706 (2024).
Niu, K. Y., Hui, G. U. O. & Jing, L. I. U. Can food security and low carbon be achieved simultaneously?—An empirical analysis of the mechanisms influencing the carbon footprint of potato and corn cultivation in irrigation areas. J. Integr. Agric. 22(4), 1230–1243 (2023).
He, Y. Food security and agriculture value-added: Do they asymmetrically matter for Korean environmental sustainability?. Cogent Food & Agriculture 9(1), 2213525 (2023).
Li, S., Samour, A., Irfan, M. & Ali, M. Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renew. Energy. 205, 156–165 (2023).
Dai, S. & Du, X. Discovering the role of trade diversification, natural resources, and environmental policy stringency on ecological sustainability in the BRICST region. Resour. Policy 85, 103868 (2023).
Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H. & Adebayo, T. S. Consumption-based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 31(3), 1123–1137 (2022).
Shah, W. U. H. et al. Role of renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and carbon emission in energy efficiency and productivity change: Evidence from G20 economies. Geosci. Front. 15(4), 101631 (2024).
Ding, T., Li, H., Tan, R. & Zhao, X. How does geopolitical risk affect carbon emissions?: An empirical study from the perspective of mineral resources extraction in OECD countries. Resour. Policy 85, 103983 (2023).
Li, R., Wang, Q. & Guo, J. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis of carbon emissions: Exploring the impact of geopolitical risks, natural resource rents, corrupt governance, and energy intensity. J. Environ. Manage. 351, 119663 (2024a).
Villanthenkodath, M. A. & Pal, S. Environmental degradation in geopolitical risk and uncertainty contexts for India: A comparison of ecological footprint, CO2 emissions, and load capacity factor. Energy Clim. Change 5, 100122 (2024).
Dong, F. et al. How green technology innovation affects carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from developed countries proposing carbon neutrality targets. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(24), 35780–35799 (2022).
Saqib, N. & Dincă, G. Exploring the asymmetric impact of economic complexity, FDI, and green technology on carbon emissions: Policy stringency for clean-energy investing countries. Geosci. Front. 15(4), 101671 (2024).
Nketiah, E., Song, H., Adjei, M., Obuobi, B. & Adu-Gyamfi, G. Assessing the influence of research and development, environmental policies, and green technology on ecological footprint for achieving environmental sustainability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 199, 114508 (2024).