Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2024).
Rogelj, J. et al. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014–1016 (2023).
Montzka, S. A., Dlugokencky, E. J. & Butler, J. H. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature 476, 43–50 (2011).
Su, X. et al. Reductions in atmospheric levels of non-CO2 greenhouse gases explain about a quarter of the 1998–2012 warming slowdown. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 594 (2024).
Harmsen, M. et al. Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility. Nat. Commun. 14, 2949 (2023).
Shindell, D. et al. A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. Science 356, 493–494 (2017).
Winiwarter, W., Hoglund-Isaksson, L., Klimont, Z., Schoepp, W. & Amann, M. Technical opportunities to reduce global anthropogenic emissions of nitrous oxide. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 014011 (2018).
Ou, Y. et al. Deep mitigation of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gases toward 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures. Nat. Commun. 12, 6245 (2021).
Weyant, J. P., De La Chesnaye, F. C. & Blanford, G. J. Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J. 27, 1–32 (2006).
Harmsen, J. et al. Long-term marginal abatement cost curves of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Environ. Sci. Policy 99, 136–149 (2019).
Kang, Y., Tian, P., Feng, K., Li, J. & Hubacek, K. Opportunities beyond net-zero CO2 for cost-effective greenhouse gas mitigation in China. Sci. Bull. 69, 3434–3443 (2024).
Purohit, P. & Höglund-Isaksson, L. Global emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases 2005–2050 with abatement potentials and costs. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 2795–2816 (2017).
Iyer, G. et al. Ratcheting of climate pledges needed to limit peak global warming. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1129–1135 (2022).
van Vuuren, D. P., Eickhout, B., Lucas, P. L. & den Elzen, M. G. J. Long-term multi-gas scenarios to stabilise radiative forcing—exploring costs and benefits within an integrated assessment framework. Energy J. 27, 201–233 (2006).
Cai, B. et al. CH4 mitigation potentials from China landfills and related environmental co-benefits. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8400 (2018).
Liu, Q., Teng, F., Nielsen, C. P., Zhang, Y. & Wu, L. Large methane mitigation potential through prioritized closure of gas-rich coal mines. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 652–658 (2024).
Tian, P. et al. Higher total energy costs strain the elderly, especially low-income, across 31 developed countries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2306771121 (2024).
Vogt-Schilb, A. et al. Cash transfers for pro-poor carbon taxes in Latin America and the Caribbean. Nat. Sustain. 2, 941–948 (2019).
Tian, P. et al. Implementation of carbon pricing in an aging world calls for targeted protection schemes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA Nexus 2, pgad209 (2023).
Guan, Y. et al. Burden of the global energy price crisis on households. Nat. Energy 8, 304–316 (2023).
Beck, M., Rivers, N., Wigle, R. & Yonezawa, H. Carbon tax and revenue recycling: impacts on households in British Columbia. Resour. Energy Econ. 41, 40–69 (2015).
Sajeewani, D., Siriwardana, M. & Mcneill, J. Household distributional and revenue recycling effects of the carbon price in Australia. Clim. Change Econ. 6, 1550012 (2015).
Metcalf, G. E. Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 3, 14375 (2009).
Nong, D., Simshauser, P. & Nguyen, D. B. Greenhouse gas emissions vs CO2 emissions: comparative analysis of a global carbon tax. Appl. Energy 298, 117223 (2021).
Renner, S. Poverty and distributional effects of a carbon tax in Mexico. Energy Policy 112, 98–110 (2018).
Nordhaus, W. Climate change: the ultimate challenge for economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 109, 1991–2014 (2019).
Report of the High-level Commission on Carbon Prices (World Bank, 2017).
Nachtigall, D., Ellis, J., Peterson, S. & Thube, S. The Economic and Environmental Benefits from International Coordination on Carbon Pricing: Insights from Economic Modelling Studies (OECD, 2021).
Rennert, K. et al. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610, 687–692 (2022).
Wang, D. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment facilities in China from 2006 to 2019. Sci. Data 9, 317 (2022).
Bazillier, R., Héricourt, J. & Ligonnière, S. Structure of income inequality and household leverage: cross-country causal evidence. Eur. Econ. Rev. 132, 103629 (2021).
Zhuang, F., Han, H., Ahsan, M. & Iqbal, A. Transitioning ecological footprint: private investment trends in renewable energy projects among G10 nations. Renew. Energy 251, 123335 (2025).
The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry (PCAF, 2020).
World Development Indicators (World Bank Group, 2025); https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Global climate pledges: a progress report. World Resources Institute https://www.wri.org/insights/climate-commitment-tracker (2024).
Müller, B. & Michaelowa, A. How to operationalize accounting under Article 6 market mechanisms of the Paris Agreement. Clim. Policy 19, 812–819 (2019).
Dhakal, S., et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 2 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/19074/1/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_Chapter02.pdf
Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 391–397 (2018).
Fujimori, S. et al. A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation. Nat. Sustain. 2, 386–396 (2019).
Hasegawa, T. et al. Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 699–703 (2018).
Wang, T. et al. Health co-benefits of achieving sustainable net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in California. Nat. Sustain. 3, 597–605 (2020).
Baunsgaard, M. T. & Vernon, N. Taxing Windfall Profits in The Energy Sector (IMF, 2022).
Li, Y. et al. Reducing climate change impacts from the global food system through diet shifts. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 943–953 (2024).
World Bank Official Boundaries (World Bank Group, 2025); https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038272/world-bank-official-boundaries
Oswald, Y., Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Owen, A. & Ivanova, D. Luxury-focused carbon taxation improves fairness of climate policy. One Earth 6, 884–898 (2023).
Antosiewicz, M., Fuentes, J. R., Lewandowski, P. & Witajewski-Baltvilks, J. Distributional effects of emission pricing in a carbon-intensive economy: the case of Poland. Energy Policy 160, 112678 (2022).
Wang, Q., Hubacek, K., Feng, K., Wei, Y.-M. & Liang, Q.-M. Distributional effects of carbon taxation. Appl. Energy 184, 1123–1131 (2016).
Steckel, J. C. et al. Distributional impacts of carbon pricing in developing Asia. Nat. Sustain. 4, 1005–1014 (2021).
Dorband, I. I., Jakob, M., Kalkuhl, M. & Steckel, J. C. Poverty and distributional effects of carbon pricing in low-and middle-income countries—a global comparative analysis. World Dev. 115, 246–257 (2019).
Coady, M. D., Flamini, V. & Sears, L. The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies Revisited: Evidence for Developing Countries (IMF, 2015); https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727215
Lockwood, M. Fossil fuel subsidy reform, rent management and political fragmentation in developing countries. New Polit. Econ. 20, 475–494 (2015).
Rahma, L., Hartono, D. & Hastuti, S. H. Carbon-tax implementation in Indonesia: a social accounting matrix analysis. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 21, 2454061 (2025).
Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Liu, Y., Marchán, E. & Vogt-Schilb, A. Managing the distributional effects of energy taxes and subsidy removal in Latin America and the Caribbean. Appl. Energy 225, 424–436 (2018).
Mainar-Causapé, A. J., Ferrari, E. & McDonald, S. Social Accounting Matrices: Basic Aspects and Main Steps for Estimation (EU, 2018).
Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E. & Reilly, J. M. Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: a general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households. Energy Econ. 33, S20–S33 (2011).
Andrew, R. M. & Peters, G. P. A multi-region input–output table based on the global trade analysis project database (GTAP-MRIO). Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 99–121 (2013).
McDonald, S. & Thierfelder, K. Deriving a Global Social Accounting Matrix From GTAP Versions 5 and 6 Data (GTAP, 2004).
Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E. & Van Der Mensbrugghe, D. The global trade analysis project (GTAP) data base: version 11. J. Glob. Econ. Anal. https://doi.org/10.21642/JGEA.070201AF (2022).
Global Consumption Database (The World Bank, 2025); https://datatopics.worldbank.org/consumption/
Household Budget Surveys (Eurostat, 2025); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/household-budget-surveys
Family Income and Expenditure Survey (Statistics Bureau of Japan, 2025); https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/sousetai/1.html
The Luxembourg Income Study Database (Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg, 2025); https://www.lisdatacenter.org/our-data/lis-database/
Junius, T. & Oosterhaven, J. The solution of updating or regionalizing a matrix with both positive and negative entries. Econ. Syst. Res. 15, 87–96 (2003).
Lenzen, M., Wood, R. & Gallego, B. Some comments on the GRAS method. Econ. Syst. Res. 19, 461–465 (2007).
Bruckner, B., Hubacek, K., Shan, Y., Zhong, H. & Feng, K. Impacts of poverty alleviation on national and global carbon emissions. Nat. Sustain. 5, 311–320 (2022).
Tian, P. et al. Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries. Nature 635, 625–630 (2024).
Allen, M. R. et al. New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 773–776 (2016).
Cain, M. et al. Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants. NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2, 29 (2019).
Denman, K.L. et al. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) Ch. 7 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
De Cara, S., Henry, L. & Jayet, P.-A. Optimal coverage of an emission tax in the presence of monitoring, reporting, and verification costs. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 89, 71–93 (2018).
Martinsson, G., Sajtos, L., Strömberg, P. & Thomann, C. The effect of carbon pricing on firm emissions: evidence from the Swedish CO2 tax. Rev. Financ. Stud. 37, 1848–1886 (2024).
Aggarwal, R., Ayhan, S. H., Jakob, M. & Steckel, J. C. Carbon pricing and household welfare: evidence from Uganda. Environ. Dev. Econ. 30, 1–25 (2025).
Solazzo, E. et al. Uncertainties in the emissions database for global atmospheric research (EDGAR) emission inventory of greenhouse gases. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 5655–5683 (2021).
Schulte, S., Jakobs, A. & Pauliuk, S. Estimating the uncertainty of the greenhouse gas emission accounts in global multi-regional input-output analysis. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 2669–2700 (2024).
Global Trade Analysis Project Database (GTAP-v11) (GTAP, 2022); https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/
Kang, Y. Code & data for ‘Distributional effects of expanding climate targets beyond CO2’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19025897 (2026).