Hahahaha and they expect that he tells truth when under oath? He is so deluded and so much tangled in so many lies of his, he would not recognise truth if it was straight sitting on his head 🤬
Proven liar to lie. That’ll work.
Under oath, the law, treaties, ethics, honour, truth, and the rights of others, are nothing but inconveniences to be cast aside for the ‘Despicables’.
> This week, Michael Ellis, the paymaster general, said it was “*an age-old principle of natural justice that no person should be a judge in their own court*”
>
>(emphasis added)
>[*Nemo judex in causa sua*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_iudex_in_causa_sua) (or nemo judex in sua causa) is a Latin phrase that means, literally, “no-one is judge in his own cause”. *It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest*. In many jurisdictions the rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: “Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done”.
So all that’ll change is we’ll hear the usual stuck record about fastest growth in the g7, high employment, fastest vaccine rollout and getting on with the job. But under oath.
And in a couple months time:
Boris Johnson may have to give evidence under oath about whether he lied under oath
The man knows no oath as he has the brain of a goat.
Everybody in the entire fucking country KNOWS he lied under oath, apart from, it would seem, a handful of Tory MPs.
What the hell is the point of these archaic codes of practice when any jumped up prick can ignore them at will, without fear of any meaningful consequence, just as long as they have a plummy voice and a grey suit? We really do allow ourselves to be governed by the very least among us. Truly hideous situation we are in.
Oh, yes, that’ll make him tell the truth.
Bold of anyone to think he won’t commit perjury.
I’m not au fait with the oaf oath
Yes he lied, we know he lies, he knows he lies, why do we carry on with this farce?
….oooooh under oath, he must be shitting himself.
/s
Getting him (or his counterpart Trump) under oath seems like a gift that’ll never happen.
Then they need to move the hearing to a venue outside of parliament. As an MP has immunity from prosecution.
Under oath what will he swear on the world according to the congenital lies by, Boris Johnson. He is a lying turd oaths and torture will not change that.
He lied to his own wives about “forsaking all others”… he’s not going to treat his colleagues or the public who elected him any better!
17 comments
Hahahaha and they expect that he tells truth when under oath? He is so deluded and so much tangled in so many lies of his, he would not recognise truth if it was straight sitting on his head 🤬
Proven liar to lie. That’ll work.
Under oath, the law, treaties, ethics, honour, truth, and the rights of others, are nothing but inconveniences to be cast aside for the ‘Despicables’.
> This week, Michael Ellis, the paymaster general, said it was “*an age-old principle of natural justice that no person should be a judge in their own court*”
>
>(emphasis added)
I thought this an odd thing to come out with in [his attack at Harman’s participation](https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2022/jun/16/boris-johnson-lord-geidt-resignation-conservatives-dominic-raab-partygate-uk-politics-latest?page=with:block-62aafc258f0892aa32e1754e#block-62aafc258f0892aa32e1754e) on the committee as it…
>[*Nemo judex in causa sua*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemo_iudex_in_causa_sua) (or nemo judex in sua causa) is a Latin phrase that means, literally, “no-one is judge in his own cause”. *It is a principle of natural justice that no person can judge a case in which they have an interest*. In many jurisdictions the rule is very strictly applied to any appearance of a possible bias, even if there is actually none: “Justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done”.
…gives the very reason why it is necessary the ethics advisor needs indepence to carry out any investigation without hinderence from any politicians, including the [imbecile](https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article21077892.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200d/0_JS201040314.jpg).
So all that’ll change is we’ll hear the usual stuck record about fastest growth in the g7, high employment, fastest vaccine rollout and getting on with the job. But under oath.
And in a couple months time:
Boris Johnson may have to give evidence under oath about whether he lied under oath
The man knows no oath as he has the brain of a goat.
Everybody in the entire fucking country KNOWS he lied under oath, apart from, it would seem, a handful of Tory MPs.
What the hell is the point of these archaic codes of practice when any jumped up prick can ignore them at will, without fear of any meaningful consequence, just as long as they have a plummy voice and a grey suit? We really do allow ourselves to be governed by the very least among us. Truly hideous situation we are in.
Oh, yes, that’ll make him tell the truth.
Bold of anyone to think he won’t commit perjury.
I’m not au fait with the oaf oath
Yes he lied, we know he lies, he knows he lies, why do we carry on with this farce?
….oooooh under oath, he must be shitting himself.
/s
Getting him (or his counterpart Trump) under oath seems like a gift that’ll never happen.
Then they need to move the hearing to a venue outside of parliament. As an MP has immunity from prosecution.
Under oath what will he swear on the world according to the congenital lies by, Boris Johnson. He is a lying turd oaths and torture will not change that.
He lied to his own wives about “forsaking all others”… he’s not going to treat his colleagues or the public who elected him any better!