I’m confused. Did the teacher tell the pupils to copy the style of that artists she introduced them to? Or did they get ‘inspired’ and she just didn’t think to tell them no?
You know on second thoughts I’m not sure I want to know…
Good job she is banned from teaching I suppose because she’s got the brains of a soggy cheese sandwich.
Did she think they’d think she was the cool teacher? Aww bless. Idiot.
If your idea involves naked children then it is a bad idea. Maybe it is different and experimental but it crosses the biggest line in teaching possible, hiding behind the idea that it is art and ‘a process’ is no justification for going ahead with it.
How things have changed. My secondary school put on a production of *Equus* in the late 80s.
Kids taking pictures of each other in their underwear is obviously a bad idea but can we not call it “sexual”? The intention, however misguided, was art not a porno shoot.
> Ms Wright was referred to the TRA by the school in 2018, after the portfolio of pupils’ work was discovered by the head of the art and design department.
I’m imagining the head walking in, whistling away, casually checking out students projects and just going wide eyed in horror.
> She told the panel that while she had introduced the pupils to an artist who created “suggestive pictures”, she had not meant for her pupils to create similar.
Jesus wept.
>he introduced the pupils to a new artist who created ‘suggestive pictures’. However, she insisted she told the students this did not mean they should create similar work.
So *she* brought it up in the first place. It wasn’t even part of the curriculum.
8 comments
I’m confused. Did the teacher tell the pupils to copy the style of that artists she introduced them to? Or did they get ‘inspired’ and she just didn’t think to tell them no?
You know on second thoughts I’m not sure I want to know…
Good job she is banned from teaching I suppose because she’s got the brains of a soggy cheese sandwich.
Did she think they’d think she was the cool teacher? Aww bless. Idiot.
If your idea involves naked children then it is a bad idea. Maybe it is different and experimental but it crosses the biggest line in teaching possible, hiding behind the idea that it is art and ‘a process’ is no justification for going ahead with it.
How things have changed. My secondary school put on a production of *Equus* in the late 80s.
Kids taking pictures of each other in their underwear is obviously a bad idea but can we not call it “sexual”? The intention, however misguided, was art not a porno shoot.
> Ms Wright was referred to the TRA by the school in 2018, after the portfolio of pupils’ work was discovered by the head of the art and design department.
I’m imagining the head walking in, whistling away, casually checking out students projects and just going wide eyed in horror.
> She told the panel that while she had introduced the pupils to an artist who created “suggestive pictures”, she had not meant for her pupils to create similar.
Jesus wept.
>he introduced the pupils to a new artist who created ‘suggestive pictures’. However, she insisted she told the students this did not mean they should create similar work.
So *she* brought it up in the first place. It wasn’t even part of the curriculum.
Sounds like a nonce.