Boris Johnson told to release ethics adviser’s resignation letter to reveal why he quit

21 comments
  1. >Pressure is growing on Boris Johnson to release a resignation letter penned by his ethics adviser, to reveal why he has quit suddenly – plunging the government into a fresh crisis.
    >
    >A former holder of the post warned the public will “draw their own conclusions” if the prime minister keeps secret what is thought to be a strongly worded exit note sent by Christopher Geidt.

    Government spokesman has said, “It ain’t going to happen. Look, you all know what a f’ing child the guy is… but at least we can all taunt him with this.”

  2. That would be some fine reading, but let’s be honest Boris doesn’t have the minerals to release that letter, as I bet it destroys him…

  3. Alternative source:

    >Boris Johnson is under mounting pressure to release the letter from Lord Christopher Geidt explaining why he quit as ethics adviser to the prime minister.
    >
    >The government published a terse statement on Wednesday night announcing that the adviser was stepping down from the role, without explaining his reasons for doing so.
    >
    >(FT: [Lord Christopher Geidt is understood to have written a full explanation as to why he quit after only 14 months](https://www.ft.com/content/013aaf74-76e7-4e31-8d9f-d3d68e6ef515) – ([🪞](https://archive.ph/ktdmr)))

  4. It won’t matter. Despite everything he is still, but their own admission, the best the Tories have. They will head down to the Winchester for a pint and wait for it all to blow over.

  5. I mean for his own sake won’t he have kept the letter quite brief and professional? Doubt it’s some scathing “tell-all”.

  6. >Mark Elliott (@ProfMarkElliott) [Jun 15, 2022](https://nitter.net/ProfMarkElliott/status/1537136642561032199#m)
    >
    >Partygate-related resignations by officials:
    >
    >1. Allegra Stratton, Govt spokesperson
    >2. John Penrose, Govt ‘anti-corruption tsar’
    >3. Lord Geidt, Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards
    >
    >Resignations so far by politicians under doctrine of ministerial responsibility:
    >
    >None

    Bonus:

    >Mark Elliott: [On Lord Geidt’s resignation and its constitutional significance](https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2022/06/15/on-lord-geidts-resignation-and-its-constitutional-significance/)

  7. I think we can all take a punt at what this letter says . It’s hardly going to congratulate the PM for being one of the most ethical people hes ever met.

    There will be nothing in this letter that sensible people don’t already know- Johnson is a liar, and a cheat, but nobody is prepared to put a stop to it.

  8. Dear Prime Minister,

    It is with deep regret that I must tender my resignation as your ethics advisor. The pimary reasons for my decision are that I **redacted** am **redacted** totally unfit for public office and **redacted** am **redacted** a proven liar without the slightest shred of integrity or basic human decency. **redacted**

    Yours faithfully,

    Lord Geidt

  9. What does it matter? What more could Tory voters hear that would tip the scales? The worst government in UK history already by most estimates. Tory voters are all selfish freaks who are morally bankrupt and devoid of principles or incredibly thick.

    Edit: or both

  10. Either he won’t do it at all for ‘security reasons’ or he will release it but with it 99% redacted for ‘security purposes’. Besides, if you cannot hazard a rough guess as to why he resigned then you have not been paying attention for the last three years.

  11. If doesnt matter. Tories could kill babies live on TV and boomers would still say “yeah but imagine if labour got in”

  12. Boris probably insists on two letters, with one being amicable and for press release.

    …..because, duplicitous cunt.

  13. From [Geidts letter](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1083401/Lord_Geidt_letter_to_PM.pdf):

    >This week, however, I was tasked to offer a view about the Government’s intention to consider measures which risk a deliberate and purposeful breach of the Ministerial Code. This request has placed me in an impossible and odious position. My informal response on Monday was that you and any other Minister should justify openly your position vis-à-vis the Code in such circumstances. However, the idea that a Prime Minister might to any degree be in the business of deliberately breaching his own Code is an affront. A deliberate breach, or even an intention to do so, would be to suspend the provisions of the Code to suit a political end. This would make a mockery not only of respect for the Code but licence the suspension of its provisions in governing the conduct of Her Majesty’s Ministers. I can have no part in this.

    ooouchh!!..

  14. Amazed this job even existed. A pointless role even at the best of times. If all those wonderfully educated chaps can’t come up their own ethics based view we’ve got problems. I wonder how much he was on.

  15. Boris is only for Boris. A shame many still get fooled by his rhetorics – it should have been clear after his covid party already.

  16. ‘The government has also said Lord Geidt was, this week, “asked to provide advice on a commercially sensitive matter in the national interest”, but declined to give any details.’

    Why do I feel like the NHS is finally getting privatised and he decided to leave, knowing it will cause riots and be an absolute shit show for all involved.

Leave a Reply