
This is where the next Planning Tribunal starts.
Paul Hyde’s nomination letter from IRDA to ABP, dated 20/11/13
On 5/12/11 IRDA asked the CRO to dissolve its organisation. It nominated Paul Hyde despite no longer being entitled to do so under planning legislation
Former board members have no idea about the nomination process pic.twitter.com/Ul9RZvkH7C
— The Ditch (@wereontheditch) June 16, 2022
2 comments
Paul Hyde’s nomination letter from IRDA to ABP, dated 20/11/13
On 5/12/11 IRDA asked the CRO to dissolve its organisation. It nominated Paul Hyde despite no longer being entitled to do so under planning legislation
Former board members have no idea about the nomination process
—
Photos in tweet | [photo 1](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FVXhE09WQAAjtO_.jpg)
—
posted by [@wereontheditch](https://twitter.com/wereontheditch/)
—
[Thanks to inteoryx, videos are supported even without Twitter API V2 support! Middle finger to you, twitter](https://github.com/inteoryx/twitter-video-dl)
Why?
ABP are being accused of considerably more interesting issues than this tbh. The report by Remy Farrell SC will presumably give a clearer picture than vague tweets, and one should keep an eye on the JRs that will ensure if ABP have been naughty.