>The former Conservative party chairman and current rebellious Tory peer was dismayed to see the “Johnson cult still hanging on”. He described the government as “shameful and seedy”. “The most depressing thing is I’ve been watching interviews with ministers this evening,” he said, “and the titles alone are so depressing. Jacob Rees-Mogg, minister for Brexit opportunities. If ever there as a contradiction in terms it is that. And nobody should ever see the words ‘Nadine Dorries’ and ‘culture secretary’ in the same sentence.”
There seems to be a theme emerginig.
That’s because all the things people care about, that they said they’d change, they haven’t.
[deleted]
It’s impossible to be a “populist” government when those in power who claim to be apart from the elite, are the elite.
Starmer is really flubbing his lines here. How is he not more popular? He’s got resume, got the intellect and got the sincerity.
I challenge anyone on here to name the shadow chancellor. Got to be more out there.
Answer:
>!Rachel Reeves!<
Maybe if they try saying Brexit 50 times in a row the morons will clap along again.
After all, we were all informed that Brexit meant being poorer, it was what was voted for, repeatedly, ironically over a slogan of “For the many, not the few”, well now the many are poor, as was voted for, and Brexit means Brexit, so the few are richer, also know as “sovereignty”, as was voted for.
And as we all know, you can’t question our Lord and Savour Brexit, sacrifice have to be made in the name Brexit, as was voted for. All while the Brexit clown is allowed to do what he likes, because he is part of the Few and therefore better than you! And you know it, and vote for it.
Isn’t that the whole point of “popularism”. They promise things they know they can’t deliver. They deliver things that sound good but don’t work.
Any government would deliver something that was popular and achievable and worked.
Popularists are defined by doing things that are popular *in the moment* and then fail.
7 comments
>The former Conservative party chairman and current rebellious Tory peer was dismayed to see the “Johnson cult still hanging on”. He described the government as “shameful and seedy”. “The most depressing thing is I’ve been watching interviews with ministers this evening,” he said, “and the titles alone are so depressing. Jacob Rees-Mogg, minister for Brexit opportunities. If ever there as a contradiction in terms it is that. And nobody should ever see the words ‘Nadine Dorries’ and ‘culture secretary’ in the same sentence.”
There seems to be a theme emerginig.
That’s because all the things people care about, that they said they’d change, they haven’t.
[deleted]
It’s impossible to be a “populist” government when those in power who claim to be apart from the elite, are the elite.
Starmer is really flubbing his lines here. How is he not more popular? He’s got resume, got the intellect and got the sincerity.
I challenge anyone on here to name the shadow chancellor. Got to be more out there.
Answer:
>!Rachel Reeves!<
Maybe if they try saying Brexit 50 times in a row the morons will clap along again.
After all, we were all informed that Brexit meant being poorer, it was what was voted for, repeatedly, ironically over a slogan of “For the many, not the few”, well now the many are poor, as was voted for, and Brexit means Brexit, so the few are richer, also know as “sovereignty”, as was voted for.
And as we all know, you can’t question our Lord and Savour Brexit, sacrifice have to be made in the name Brexit, as was voted for. All while the Brexit clown is allowed to do what he likes, because he is part of the Few and therefore better than you! And you know it, and vote for it.
Isn’t that the whole point of “popularism”. They promise things they know they can’t deliver. They deliver things that sound good but don’t work.
Any government would deliver something that was popular and achievable and worked.
Popularists are defined by doing things that are popular *in the moment* and then fail.