This article first appeared in Forum, The Edge Malaysia Weekly on June 29, 2026 – July 5, 2026

For decades, corporate finance operated on a simple assumption: the world, while imperfect, was broadly stable. Supply chains stretched efficiently across continents, inflation remained manageable and globalisation rewarded firms that optimised costs and capital. That assumption is now under strain. From the Russia-Ukraine war to ongoing tensions in the Middle East, geopolitical conflicts are no longer temporary disruptions. They are persistent forces reshaping global trade, capital flows and cost structures. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that rising geopolitical fragmentation is tightening financial conditions and increasing market volatility with implications for corporate balance sheets worldwide.

For Malaysia, the stakes are particularly high. As a deeply trade-dependent economy, Malaysia’s total trade exceeds 130% of gross domestic product, according to the World Bank and Department of Statistics Malaysia. The country is also tightly embedded in global value chains, particularly in electronics, commodities and energy. When geopolitical tensions disrupt these systems, the effects are transmitted quickly through higher costs, delayed revenues and tighter liquidity.

When geopolitics hits the balance sheet

The financial impact of geopolitical risk is no longer theoretical. It is now clearly measurable across corporate balance sheets. Energy markets provide the clearest example. Oil price shocks during periods of conflict have historically seen spikes of 20% to 40% within months (based on historical Brent crude volatility trends). For firms linked to Petroliam Nasional Bhd and downstream manufacturing sectors, such volatility directly affects margins, pricing and profitability.

Supply chain disruptions are equally significant. Malaysia plays a critical role in the global semiconductor ecosystem, particularly in assembly, testing and packaging. This exposes firms such as Inari Amertron Bhd (KL:INARI), which is involved in Apple Inc’s supply chain, to geopolitical fragmentation. Even minor disruptions in chip flows can translate into delayed revenues and increased working capital requirements.

On the financial side, global uncertainty is tightening liquidity. Studies from the IMF and Bank for International Settlements suggest that geopolitical shocks can increase corporate borrowing costs by 50 to 150 basis points, particularly in emerging markets. In response, banks such as Malayan Banking Bhd (KL:MAYBANK) have strengthened provisioning buffers and adopted more cautious lending practices. Globally, corporations are already adapting. Apple has accelerated supply chain diversification beyond China, while Tesla has localised production across multiple regions. These shifts signal a broader reality: resilience is becoming a strategic priority.

A new mandate for finance teams

These developments are quietly redefining the role of finance within organisations. First, forecasting is giving way to scenario planning. Traditional budgeting assumes linear trends. Today’s environment is nonlinear, shaped by shocks that are difficult to predict but impossible to ignore. Finance teams must now prepare for multiple scenarios including severe disruption cases.

Second, efficiency is replaced by resilience. The just-in-time model, once a hallmark of operational excellence, is being reconsidered. Holding additional liquidity or inventory may reduce short-term returns, but it enhances survival in times of disruption. Third, finance is becoming inherently strategic. Decisions on supply chain restructuring, capital allocation and risk management increasingly sit at the intersection of finance and operations. The chief financial officer’s (CFO) role is expanding — from reporting performance to shaping enterprise strategy.

What Malaysian firms must do now?

In what analysts describe as a BANI (brittle, anxious, nonlinear and incomprehensible) world, firms must adopt a more proactive and integrated approach to financial management. In this environment, Malaysian firms’ top management must focus on the following 10 strategic priorities:

The first priority is building stronger liquidity buffers. Firms with higher cash reserves have consistently demonstrated faster recovery during crises. Liquidity should be viewed not as idle capital, but as strategic flexibility, especially in current times.

Second, working capital must be re-engineered. Global disruptions have extended cash conversion cycles. Firms need to tighten receivables, optimise inventory and negotiate more flexible payables from their suppliers to maintain cash flow stability.

Third, funding sources should be diversified. Over-dependence on a single lender increases vulnerability. Firms should expand access to multi-bank arrangements, supply chain finance platforms and especially fintech-based lending solutions.

Fourth, geopolitical risk must be embedded upfront into financial models. Capital budgeting frameworks need to incorporate scenarios involving trade disruptions, commodity shocks, wars and sanctions. Traditional net present value models must evolve into risk-adjusted decision tools.

Fifth, hedging strategies must be strengthened. Currency volatility remains a major concern for Malaysian firms operating in global markets. Active management of foreign exchange and commodity exposures is no longer optional but a “must do” for firms.

Sixth, finance must align closely with supply chain strategy. Finance teams should play a central role in evaluating supplier risks, supporting diversification efforts and funding strategic inventory decisions.

Seventh, investment in digital finance capabilities is critical. Firms adopting real-time data analytics and artificial intelligence-driven forecasting tools have reported significant improvements in cash flow visibility and decision-making speed. This is a must to do in current times.

Eighth, capital structures must be stress-tested. Management teams need to ask difficult questions: Can the firm survive a sharp revenue shock? Can it refinance under tighter credit conditions? Stress testing must become a core managerial practice.

Ninth, regionalisation offers a strategic opportunity. With globalisation under strain, strengthening Asean-based supply chains can reduce exposure to distant geopolitical risks while enhancing operational resilience.

Tenth, crisis governance must be institutionalised. Leading firms such as Toyota, Unilever and Maersk are establishing cross-functional “war rooms” to monitor risks and respond rapidly. Agile decision-making is becoming a competitive advantage. Malaysian firms can learn from such global experiences.

The rise of the CFO as chief resilience officer

These shifts point to a broader transformation in leadership. The CFO is evolving into a “chief resilience officer” — a role that extends beyond financial performance to ensuring organisational survival in uncertain conditions. This requires a shift from optimisation to adaptability. The objective is no longer to maximise efficiency under a single forecast, but to remain robust across multiple possible futures.

Conclusion

The current geopolitical environment marks a structural break. The era of stable globalisation is giving way to fragmentation, volatility and uncertainty. For Malaysian firms, the implications are clear. Financial strategies must evolve to prioritise resilience, flexibility and strategic foresight. Those that adapt will not only navigate disruption but also capture emerging opportunities in a reconfigured global economy. Those that do not may find that the next shock is not merely disruptive, but decisive.

Satish Kumar is the Tan Sri Azman Hashim endowed chair in banking and finance and professor of finance at Sunway Business School, Sunway University

Save by subscribing to us for
your print and/or
digital copy.

P/S: The Edge is also available on
Apple’s App Store and
Android’s Google Play.