> no investigative bias was irrational and contrary to the weight of evidence
That sentence could go either way, was there no bias found or was the bias deemed rational?
Very murky case involving British Intellegence services providing targeting info and hardware to Loyalists who fucked up the original plan to bomb a nearby pub that had been selected by them. They could not get by security at the Gem bar so opted for the next target full of taigs that they could find.
Subsequently the Army, police, British press and politicians smeared and slandered the victims by claiming the atrocity had been an IRA “own goal” and that people in the bar knew a bomb was being assembled inside. Following the tried and tested check list of delay, deny, smear and slander victims and aid the murderers in evading justice so they can perpetrate even more atrocities.
Judging by its appearance on this sub, I don’t think I have to open this to see who was behind it, or who was not behind it
3 comments
> no investigative bias was irrational and contrary to the weight of evidence
That sentence could go either way, was there no bias found or was the bias deemed rational?
Very murky case involving British Intellegence services providing targeting info and hardware to Loyalists who fucked up the original plan to bomb a nearby pub that had been selected by them. They could not get by security at the Gem bar so opted for the next target full of taigs that they could find.
Subsequently the Army, police, British press and politicians smeared and slandered the victims by claiming the atrocity had been an IRA “own goal” and that people in the bar knew a bomb was being assembled inside. Following the tried and tested check list of delay, deny, smear and slander victims and aid the murderers in evading justice so they can perpetrate even more atrocities.
Judging by its appearance on this sub, I don’t think I have to open this to see who was behind it, or who was not behind it