MPs should block the Australia trade deal because the government has broken a promise to allow it to be scrutinised properly, a damning report says.
Ministers are condemned for trying “to rush it through” – despite evidence that farmers will suffer and the climate crisis has been sacrificed – even as Canberra pauses on ratifying the agreement.
MPs are supposed to be given time to consider if any new trade deal protects human health, animal welfare and the environment before the ratification process begins.
But the Commons international trade committee says it was denied full information until 6 June – yet ratification of the Australia deal has already begun and will conclude on 20 July.
Angus MacNeil warned damage from the deal might not be “fully uncovered” – pointing out how ministers praised the Northern Ireland Protocol, but are now tearing it up.
“This could have damaging effects for businesses and communities across the UK,” he warned, calling the lack of scrutiny “beyond belief”.
Calling for ratification to be delayed, Mr MacNeill added: “The government rushed the scrutiny of the Northern Ireland Protocol, and we can all see the consequences of that now.”
The committee will demand answers from Anne-Marie Trevelyan, the international trade secretary, when she gives evidence on the Australia trade deal on Wednesday.
She is accused of dodging scrutiny until after kickstarting ratification under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act (CRaG) – the MPs noting her appearance “follows eight requests”.
The deal has huge political significance for the government – as the first post-Brexit agreement with a new partner – but is forecast to add just 0.08 per cent to the economy and not until 2035.
Ministers say it will allow young backpackers to visit Australia for longer and give greater certainty to scientists, lawyers and other professionals seeking visas.
But tariffs will be scrapped immediately on imported beef and lamb, up to a “cap” on sales expected many times the current level of Australian meat sold in this country, alarming farmers.
The government’s own impact assessment revealed the deal will cost farmers and food producers almost £300m – despite Boris Johnson’s vow to “protect’ them.
There is also anger over the UK secretly dropping a pledge to bind Australia to the 1.5C global temperature rise target at the heart of the last year’s Cop26 climate negotiations.
A Lords committee raised fears that “deforested land” in Australia will be used to produce beef and cereal for the UK and “pesticides banned in the UK”.
But the Department of International Trade argued it had “made enhanced commitments to scrutiny and transparency”.
“This includes already giving parliament over six months to scrutinise the legal text, in addition to the 21-day period provided by us triggering the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act process,” a spokesperson said.
Another Boris back hander job.
But…TimTams
A trade deal is between two sovereign nations and is made on the behalf of people of those nations to benefit them.
When a trade deal is made its important that representatives get to scrutinize every detail on the behalf of the people and that the public are aware of its terms so they too can object and make there concerns heard by their representatives.
When a proposal for a trade deal is made and the terms are unknown and unscrtinised it follows that any deal runs contrary to the basic tenets of a democracy
It was pointed out at the start the UK / Australia trade deal was a bad deal for UK farmers.
It’s alright guys.
Just sign the deal, don’t bother scrutinising it, let alone read it.
The UK government can just pass a law later on and unilaterally break the parts they don’t like.
Breaking international agreements is the new normal for the UK rogue state.
.
Fucking Tories are at it again.
Seriously, there’s going to be another Guy Fawkes at this rate.
Good opportunity for those anti-boris rebels to do their bit.
Let’s see if their opposition is actually worth a damn.
8 comments
Ad free version:
MPs should block the Australia trade deal because the government has broken a promise to allow it to be scrutinised properly, a damning report says.
Ministers are condemned for trying “to rush it through” – despite evidence that farmers will suffer and the climate crisis has been sacrificed – even as Canberra pauses on ratifying the agreement.
MPs are supposed to be given time to consider if any new trade deal protects human health, animal welfare and the environment before the ratification process begins.
But the Commons international trade committee says it was denied full information until 6 June – yet ratification of the Australia deal has already begun and will conclude on 20 July.
Angus MacNeil warned damage from the deal might not be “fully uncovered” – pointing out how ministers praised the Northern Ireland Protocol, but are now tearing it up.
“This could have damaging effects for businesses and communities across the UK,” he warned, calling the lack of scrutiny “beyond belief”.
Calling for ratification to be delayed, Mr MacNeill added: “The government rushed the scrutiny of the Northern Ireland Protocol, and we can all see the consequences of that now.”
The committee will demand answers from Anne-Marie Trevelyan, the international trade secretary, when she gives evidence on the Australia trade deal on Wednesday.
She is accused of dodging scrutiny until after kickstarting ratification under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act (CRaG) – the MPs noting her appearance “follows eight requests”.
The deal has huge political significance for the government – as the first post-Brexit agreement with a new partner – but is forecast to add just 0.08 per cent to the economy and not until 2035.
Ministers say it will allow young backpackers to visit Australia for longer and give greater certainty to scientists, lawyers and other professionals seeking visas.
But tariffs will be scrapped immediately on imported beef and lamb, up to a “cap” on sales expected many times the current level of Australian meat sold in this country, alarming farmers.
The government’s own impact assessment revealed the deal will cost farmers and food producers almost £300m – despite Boris Johnson’s vow to “protect’ them.
There is also anger over the UK secretly dropping a pledge to bind Australia to the 1.5C global temperature rise target at the heart of the last year’s Cop26 climate negotiations.
A Lords committee raised fears that “deforested land” in Australia will be used to produce beef and cereal for the UK and “pesticides banned in the UK”.
But the Department of International Trade argued it had “made enhanced commitments to scrutiny and transparency”.
“This includes already giving parliament over six months to scrutinise the legal text, in addition to the 21-day period provided by us triggering the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act process,” a spokesperson said.
Another Boris back hander job.
But…TimTams
A trade deal is between two sovereign nations and is made on the behalf of people of those nations to benefit them.
When a trade deal is made its important that representatives get to scrutinize every detail on the behalf of the people and that the public are aware of its terms so they too can object and make there concerns heard by their representatives.
When a proposal for a trade deal is made and the terms are unknown and unscrtinised it follows that any deal runs contrary to the basic tenets of a democracy
It was pointed out at the start the UK / Australia trade deal was a bad deal for UK farmers.
It’s alright guys.
Just sign the deal, don’t bother scrutinising it, let alone read it.
The UK government can just pass a law later on and unilaterally break the parts they don’t like.
Breaking international agreements is the new normal for the UK rogue state.
.
Fucking Tories are at it again.
Seriously, there’s going to be another Guy Fawkes at this rate.
Good opportunity for those anti-boris rebels to do their bit.
Let’s see if their opposition is actually worth a damn.