Brussels is ready to rip up a series of lucrative mini-deals with Britain if Boris Johnson presses ahead with a bonfire of EU red tape, the bloc’s chief Brexit negotiator has said.
Maros Sefcovic warned No 10 that its plans to ditch hundreds or even thousands of European rules will threaten ties on data sharing, banking and food exports.
During a keynote speech to business leaders in London he said a wholesale departure from EU standards “will further deepen the barriers to trade” during a cost-of-living crisis.
Alongside the Brexit trade deal with the bloc, Britain has also struck a series of separate agreements to boost access to the European market for businesses.
They include a data adequacy pact which ensures the free flow of personal data which is crucial for many firms, especially those in the services sector.
There is also a deal on sales of organic food.
Meanwhile, Brussels has been stalling on implementing a promise to improve the currently limited access for City banks.
All three agreements are dependent on UK and EU rules being judged to be equivalent and can be pulled at short notice, with the Commission making the final judgement.
A 2020 report by UCL put the value of the data pact at up to £1.6 billion. British farmers sell £225 million of organic food to the bloc a year, according to the NFU.
Landmark Brexit Freedoms Bill due next month
Jacob Rees-Mogg, the minister for efficiency, is set to publish a landmark Brexit Freedoms Bill next month which will set out plans to take advantage of leaving the bloc.
He has said scrapping unnecessary Brussels red tape will help boost the UK economy and tackle inflation by easing the burden on businesses and leading to lower prices for goods.
The Government has pledged to cut £1 billion of EU-related costs on firms and has published a website so the public can track the repealing of up to 4,418 inherited laws.
Its plans are expected to include major breaks with Brussels rules in areas like banking and insurance regulation, gene-edited crops, data protection and the automotive sector.
But Mr Sefcovic warned the proposals are likely to prompt a strong response from the bloc, adding the row over the Northern Ireland Protocol had heightened mistrust of the UK.
“A long shadow being cast over our relationship in this way increases our vigilance including in relation to UK statements about ‘slashing EU regulation’, touted by some as a major benefit of Brexit,” he told a Bloomberg event.
“The UK is, of course, fully entitled to diverge from the EU if it wishes to do so. But this regulatory divergence has limits as well as consequences.
“For instance, in the area of financial services, data, and certain food products, the EU’s unilateral decision to grant market access is conditioned on the UK’s current regulatory framework.
“In other words, an end of mutual recognition is a possibility if the UK changes its standards. We will therefore be watching developments closely.
‘Divergence means more friction and less trade’
“But even where regulatory divergence is practically and legally possible, it will carry more cost and will further deepen the barriers to trade between the EU and the UK. Because more divergence means more friction and less trade – simple as that.”
Mr Sefcovic cited statistics that show Brexit is already dampening Britain’s trade with the continent and said “at times of economic strain, this hurts businesses on both sides of the Channel”.
He also used his speech to call on the Prime Minister to “get Brexit done” and put an end to the Protocol row, accusing him of performing an “outright U-turn” on the deal he signed in 2019.
The EU negotiator dismissed the tabling this week of legislation to rip up Irish Sea border checks as “illegal” and said it has “put us back two years”, adding that Mr Johnson should show the “political courage” to agree a compromise.
He urged the UK to return to the table but said any talks must not just be “window dressing” and that the bloc is “not going to negotiate when you have a gun on the table”.
“It is simply unrealistic and unfair for London to expect that all barriers can be lifted when goods move to Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. On this, the UK government needs to be honest at home and respectful vis-à-vis the EU,” he said.
“Zero checks is not an option. Checking everything is not practical. But making some minimal checks – yes, that’ll work.
“Given the strong economic headwinds and rising energy and food prices as well as inflation, this is surely the moment to abandon the chronic trend of non-implementation and unilateral surprises that has emerged from the UK side.”
Mr Sefcovic said cooperation between the UK and EU over the Ukraine war had shown how the two sides can work together and that “it is clearer than ever before that the EU and the UK are natural allies”.
He said: “In the current geopolitical environment, where the rules-based order is under pressure, strengthening Western unity should be our moral imperative. That includes strong, strategic EU-UK relations.”
*By* Nick Gutteridge
29 June 2022 • 9:15pm
It’s almost like actions have legal consequences. And that we are no longer, or have been for some time, an empire.
>BBC: [Brexit: Experts raise legal doubts about UK’s protocol plan](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-61982295)
>
>There are serious doubts about the government’s justification for unilaterally overriding the Northern Ireland Protocol, legal experts have told MPs
–
>BBC: [Dale Farm: Profits surge for NI agri-food business](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-61981960)
>
>Dale Farm, one of Northern Ireland’s biggest agri-food businesses, almost tripled its pre-tax profits to £22m in 2021
>They include a data adequacy pact which ensures the free flow of personal data which is crucial for many firms, especially those in the services sector.
if corporate surveillance is ‘crucial’ for your firm then maybe your firm shouldn’t exist
I feel confident that the loss of both coverage of human, and workers rights, will be covered in a completely unbiased way. Kind of “profits sore”, (whilst individuals suffer, wage rates plummet etc).
I love the way *The Telegraph* put “barriers to trade” in scare quotes, as if they can’t afford journalists who are economically literate.
They should have mockified it instead, *bArRiErS To tRaDe*.
Why does the EU think that Sefcovic is a suitable person to be given any sort of power in their organisation?
Looking at his wiki he’s a Moscow trained communist, massive homophobe, anti women’s rights, far left populist whose pro-Russia party is now being described as “neo-fascist”. A real vile POS.
He makes the Tories look like a bunch of hippies.
Simple, get Boris and putin to do a deal, cut out the EU and start producing stuff.
Sell cheap oil to EU for a 50% markup.
EU biggest corrupted shambles ever
The old “two wrongs make a right”, got you loud and clear.
No idea, genuinely, how I did that twice. Back to the debate.
But my reply ain’t there. Not a loss to humanity though. Just weird
11 comments
Maros Sefcovic cautions No 10 that its plans to ditch numerous European rules will threaten ties on data sharing, banking and food exports
([🪞](https://archive.ph/dMKFz))
Brussels is ready to rip up a series of lucrative mini-deals with Britain if Boris Johnson presses ahead with a bonfire of EU red tape, the bloc’s chief Brexit negotiator has said.
Maros Sefcovic warned No 10 that its plans to ditch hundreds or even thousands of European rules will threaten ties on data sharing, banking and food exports.
During a keynote speech to business leaders in London he said a wholesale departure from EU standards “will further deepen the barriers to trade” during a cost-of-living crisis.
Alongside the Brexit trade deal with the bloc, Britain has also struck a series of separate agreements to boost access to the European market for businesses.
They include a data adequacy pact which ensures the free flow of personal data which is crucial for many firms, especially those in the services sector.
There is also a deal on sales of organic food.
Meanwhile, Brussels has been stalling on implementing a promise to improve the currently limited access for City banks.
All three agreements are dependent on UK and EU rules being judged to be equivalent and can be pulled at short notice, with the Commission making the final judgement.
A 2020 report by UCL put the value of the data pact at up to £1.6 billion. British farmers sell £225 million of organic food to the bloc a year, according to the NFU.
Landmark Brexit Freedoms Bill due next month
Jacob Rees-Mogg, the minister for efficiency, is set to publish a landmark Brexit Freedoms Bill next month which will set out plans to take advantage of leaving the bloc.
He has said scrapping unnecessary Brussels red tape will help boost the UK economy and tackle inflation by easing the burden on businesses and leading to lower prices for goods.
The Government has pledged to cut £1 billion of EU-related costs on firms and has published a website so the public can track the repealing of up to 4,418 inherited laws.
Its plans are expected to include major breaks with Brussels rules in areas like banking and insurance regulation, gene-edited crops, data protection and the automotive sector.
But Mr Sefcovic warned the proposals are likely to prompt a strong response from the bloc, adding the row over the Northern Ireland Protocol had heightened mistrust of the UK.
“A long shadow being cast over our relationship in this way increases our vigilance including in relation to UK statements about ‘slashing EU regulation’, touted by some as a major benefit of Brexit,” he told a Bloomberg event.
“The UK is, of course, fully entitled to diverge from the EU if it wishes to do so. But this regulatory divergence has limits as well as consequences.
“For instance, in the area of financial services, data, and certain food products, the EU’s unilateral decision to grant market access is conditioned on the UK’s current regulatory framework.
“In other words, an end of mutual recognition is a possibility if the UK changes its standards. We will therefore be watching developments closely.
‘Divergence means more friction and less trade’
“But even where regulatory divergence is practically and legally possible, it will carry more cost and will further deepen the barriers to trade between the EU and the UK. Because more divergence means more friction and less trade – simple as that.”
Mr Sefcovic cited statistics that show Brexit is already dampening Britain’s trade with the continent and said “at times of economic strain, this hurts businesses on both sides of the Channel”.
He also used his speech to call on the Prime Minister to “get Brexit done” and put an end to the Protocol row, accusing him of performing an “outright U-turn” on the deal he signed in 2019.
The EU negotiator dismissed the tabling this week of legislation to rip up Irish Sea border checks as “illegal” and said it has “put us back two years”, adding that Mr Johnson should show the “political courage” to agree a compromise.
He urged the UK to return to the table but said any talks must not just be “window dressing” and that the bloc is “not going to negotiate when you have a gun on the table”.
“It is simply unrealistic and unfair for London to expect that all barriers can be lifted when goods move to Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. On this, the UK government needs to be honest at home and respectful vis-à-vis the EU,” he said.
“Zero checks is not an option. Checking everything is not practical. But making some minimal checks – yes, that’ll work.
“Given the strong economic headwinds and rising energy and food prices as well as inflation, this is surely the moment to abandon the chronic trend of non-implementation and unilateral surprises that has emerged from the UK side.”
Mr Sefcovic said cooperation between the UK and EU over the Ukraine war had shown how the two sides can work together and that “it is clearer than ever before that the EU and the UK are natural allies”.
He said: “In the current geopolitical environment, where the rules-based order is under pressure, strengthening Western unity should be our moral imperative. That includes strong, strategic EU-UK relations.”
*By* Nick Gutteridge
29 June 2022 • 9:15pm
It’s almost like actions have legal consequences. And that we are no longer, or have been for some time, an empire.
More news from today:
>Politico: [Poll: Just 5 percent of Northern Ireland voters trust UK to manage trade dispute](https://www.politico.eu/article/poll-northern-ireland-trusts-eu-much-more-than-uk-to-manage-trade-dispute/)
>
>Nearly half think Brussels and Dublin represent their post-Brexit interests fairly.
–
>Financial Times: [N Ireland businesses fear UK move to scrap Brexit trading arrangements](https://www.ft.com/content/96096b2a-bdac-490c-9a46-97a7f69b924d) – ([🪞](https://archive.ph/cqbfQ))
>
>Analysts say protocol agreement has given a fillip to the entire region’s economy
–
>BBC: [Brexit: Experts raise legal doubts about UK’s protocol plan](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-61982295)
>
>There are serious doubts about the government’s justification for unilaterally overriding the Northern Ireland Protocol, legal experts have told MPs
–
>BBC: [Dale Farm: Profits surge for NI agri-food business](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-61981960)
>
>Dale Farm, one of Northern Ireland’s biggest agri-food businesses, almost tripled its pre-tax profits to £22m in 2021
–
>The Grocer: [EU-UK veterinary deal could soothe Northern Ireland Protocol tensions](https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/sourcing/eu-uk-veterinary-deal-could-soothe-northern-ireland-protocol-tensions/668845.article) – ([🪞](https://archive.ph/B093G))
>
>A wider EU-UK veterinary agreement would remove much of the difficulties faced by Great Britain-based food and agriculture producers sending goods to Northern Ireland, leading food sector experts have suggested.
–
>Irish Farmers Weekly: [Dublin’s loss is Belfast’s gain](https://www.farmersjournal.ie/dublin-s-loss-is-belfast-s-gain-704336) – ([🪞](https://archive.ph/t64P7))
>
>Belfast harbour results show growth of business as supply chains adjust to Brexit controls.
>They include a data adequacy pact which ensures the free flow of personal data which is crucial for many firms, especially those in the services sector.
if corporate surveillance is ‘crucial’ for your firm then maybe your firm shouldn’t exist
I feel confident that the loss of both coverage of human, and workers rights, will be covered in a completely unbiased way. Kind of “profits sore”, (whilst individuals suffer, wage rates plummet etc).
I love the way *The Telegraph* put “barriers to trade” in scare quotes, as if they can’t afford journalists who are economically literate.
They should have mockified it instead, *bArRiErS To tRaDe*.
Why does the EU think that Sefcovic is a suitable person to be given any sort of power in their organisation?
Looking at his wiki he’s a Moscow trained communist, massive homophobe, anti women’s rights, far left populist whose pro-Russia party is now being described as “neo-fascist”. A real vile POS.
He makes the Tories look like a bunch of hippies.
Simple, get Boris and putin to do a deal, cut out the EU and start producing stuff.
Sell cheap oil to EU for a 50% markup.
EU biggest corrupted shambles ever
The old “two wrongs make a right”, got you loud and clear.
No idea, genuinely, how I did that twice. Back to the debate.
But my reply ain’t there. Not a loss to humanity though. Just weird