You have Cheshire in midlands. It should be Northwest England.
Dyfed hasn’t existed since 1996.
As somebody from Buckingham:
1. Not sure why we’re the only county that gets to be in two regions at once:
2. Not quite sure why one of those regions is greater London, Essex, and Kent
3. I’m not sure why there’s a region called “three counties” over in the West Country, but in Buckingham, “three counties” refers to Bucks, Herts, and Beds. So that grouping would make more sense.
At least in the case of my family, the three counties we travel between most are Bucks, Herts, and Beds. My dad’s family is from Herts, my sister works in Herts, I went to university in Beds, my sister was born in Beds.
Cardiff?
Swansea and Newport would like a word
The lowlands is just anywhere that isn’t the Highlands or islands so it would include the central belt.
You did the North West dirty with this map.
Are you aware there is more to the north than “North West/Cumbria, Northumbria, and Yorkshire?
​
If you are going to use counties, use every single county rather than taking a few counties and then merging them all together under one name.
The British Isles already have many classification systems for the regions which work and make sense. This doesn’t.
*2)Greater sussex is not a thing. Attempts to lump Portsmouth and Southampton together tend to be termed things like “M27 corridor” or “solent city”
Where’s Durham? Teeside?
Throw some numbers on there as some of the colours are very similar.
You might get some Irish posters being unhappy about the term British Isles.
The Home Counties is a well defined term, but that definition and this map do not agree. Also what’s the Greater Sussex thing?
You got East Anglia right, though.
Colours aren’t the best way of doing this for accessibility reasons.
Also, many of the colours are similar.
Wiltshire not in the West Country? Them’s fighting words son.
“Cardiff” should be split east and west with Glamorgan as the west and Gwent as the east.
Apart from that Wales is fine. Bit sparse, but fine.
So Cornwall is not in the west country?
No Pembrokeshire Carmarthenshire or half of the Welsh counties this is utter bollocks
This is a bullshit post designed to inflict conflict dun bite g is an arse for even posting it
I can’t imagine those people from Lincolnshire being classed as East Midlanders. They are quite happy being lower Yorkshire
The Wirral and Cheshire as West Midlands? I think you’ll find they’re actually the South Northwestlands.
You forgot the algarves mate
The absolute state of this
I don’t like the colour-scheme….
Colourblind – I see about 9 Yorkshires.
Sorry if I’m missing the point, but I’m not really sure what the purpose of this is? Just get a map that shows all the counties, and then you will have an accurate map.
This map is just too inaccurate. ‘Greater Sussex’? Somehow it has invaded Hampshire & Wiltshire.
‘West Midlands’? This has taken over Cheshire, Liverpool and Manchester.
25 comments
You have Cheshire in midlands. It should be Northwest England.
Dyfed hasn’t existed since 1996.
As somebody from Buckingham:
1. Not sure why we’re the only county that gets to be in two regions at once:
2. Not quite sure why one of those regions is greater London, Essex, and Kent
3. I’m not sure why there’s a region called “three counties” over in the West Country, but in Buckingham, “three counties” refers to Bucks, Herts, and Beds. So that grouping would make more sense.
At least in the case of my family, the three counties we travel between most are Bucks, Herts, and Beds. My dad’s family is from Herts, my sister works in Herts, I went to university in Beds, my sister was born in Beds.
Cardiff?
Swansea and Newport would like a word
The lowlands is just anywhere that isn’t the Highlands or islands so it would include the central belt.
You did the North West dirty with this map.
Are you aware there is more to the north than “North West/Cumbria, Northumbria, and Yorkshire?
​
If you are going to use counties, use every single county rather than taking a few counties and then merging them all together under one name.
The British Isles already have many classification systems for the regions which work and make sense. This doesn’t.
*1)The real regions are travel to work areas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travel_to_work_area
*2)Greater sussex is not a thing. Attempts to lump Portsmouth and Southampton together tend to be termed things like “M27 corridor” or “solent city”
Where’s Durham? Teeside?
Throw some numbers on there as some of the colours are very similar.
You might get some Irish posters being unhappy about the term British Isles.
The Home Counties is a well defined term, but that definition and this map do not agree. Also what’s the Greater Sussex thing?
You got East Anglia right, though.
Colours aren’t the best way of doing this for accessibility reasons.
Also, many of the colours are similar.
Wiltshire not in the West Country? Them’s fighting words son.
“Cardiff” should be split east and west with Glamorgan as the west and Gwent as the east.
Apart from that Wales is fine. Bit sparse, but fine.
So Cornwall is not in the west country?
No Pembrokeshire Carmarthenshire or half of the Welsh counties this is utter bollocks
This is a bullshit post designed to inflict conflict dun bite g is an arse for even posting it
I can’t imagine those people from Lincolnshire being classed as East Midlanders. They are quite happy being lower Yorkshire
The Wirral and Cheshire as West Midlands? I think you’ll find they’re actually the South Northwestlands.
You forgot the algarves mate
The absolute state of this
I don’t like the colour-scheme….
Colourblind – I see about 9 Yorkshires.
Sorry if I’m missing the point, but I’m not really sure what the purpose of this is? Just get a map that shows all the counties, and then you will have an accurate map.
This map is just too inaccurate. ‘Greater Sussex’? Somehow it has invaded Hampshire & Wiltshire.
‘West Midlands’? This has taken over Cheshire, Liverpool and Manchester.
It’s just not accurate, sorry.