Another article where they don’t state what was actually said.
Said he was wearing white socks I think.
I’m always extremely wary of any news article that says “racist comments” was used, but fails to actually print what was said, not even in a censored replace-the-middle-letters-in-the-racist-word-with-‘***’ way.
There needs to be the proper context shown, for people to fully understand what was happening/said and for them to judge if it was indeed racist language or not.
You can’t just take someone’s word that someone else was being racist without them providing any meaningful proof or context to their claims.
Christ, and I thought the sacking of the officers who made jokes over WhatsApp was bad. Now you’ve got to watch what you say at house parties. Orwellian as fuck.
5 comments
Shocking!
Or, you know, not at all shocking.
Another article where they don’t state what was actually said.
Said he was wearing white socks I think.
I’m always extremely wary of any news article that says “racist comments” was used, but fails to actually print what was said, not even in a censored replace-the-middle-letters-in-the-racist-word-with-‘***’ way.
There needs to be the proper context shown, for people to fully understand what was happening/said and for them to judge if it was indeed racist language or not.
You can’t just take someone’s word that someone else was being racist without them providing any meaningful proof or context to their claims.
Christ, and I thought the sacking of the officers who made jokes over WhatsApp was bad. Now you’ve got to watch what you say at house parties. Orwellian as fuck.