Paris’s fire-ravaged Notre-Dame cathedral risks resembling a “politically correct Disneyland” under controversial plans for its renovation seen by The Telegraph.
Critics have warned that the world-famous cathedral will be turned into an “experimental showroom” under plans to dramatically change the inside of the medieval building.
Under the proposed changes, confessional boxes, altars and classical sculptures will be replaced with modern art murals, and new sound and light effects to create “emotional spaces”.
There will be themed chapels on a “discovery trail”, with an emphasis on Africa and Asia, while quotes from the Bible will be projected onto chapel walls in various languages, including Mandarin.
The final chapel on the trail will have a strong environmental emphasis.
“It’s as if Disney were entering Notre-Dame,” said Maurice Culot, a prize-winning Paris-based architect, urbanist, theorist and critic who has seen the plans
“What they are proposing to do to Notre-Dame would never be done to Westminster Abbey or Saint Peter’s in Rome. It’s a kind of theme park and very childish and trivial given the grandeur of the place,” he told The Telegraph.
A senior source close to the renovation said that the plans risked turning the global beacon of Christianity into an “experimental showroom” that would “mutilate” the work of Eugene Viollet-le-Duc, the celebrated architect who restored the cathedral following the ravishes of the French Revolution in an effort to recapture the spirit of Medieval Christianity.
“Can you imagine the administration of the Holy See allowing something like this in the Sistine Chapel?,” said the senior source with access to the latest plans. “It would be unimaginable. We are not in an empty space here.
“This is political correctness gone mad. They want to turn Notre-Dame into an experimental liturgical showroom that exists nowhere else whereas it should be a landmark where the slightest change must be handled with great care.”
A global wave of emotion saw 340,000 donors contribute €833 million (£705 million) to restoring the iconic edifice. Some €165 million (£140 million) had already been spent by September on securing the cathedral, which was structurally damaged during the fire. A second chunk of €262.6 million (£222 million) in donations will go towards phase one of restoration work.
Jean-Louis Georgelin, the general who President Emmanuel Macron tasked with rebuilding Notre-Dame, has pledged that it will be sufficiently restored to stage a Te Deum on April 16 2024, in time for the Olympic Games in Paris.
Initially Edouard Philippe, the French prime minister at the time, said he would launch an international competition to rebuild the destroyed roof and spire, potentially with a modern design “that bears the mark of our time”.
After widespread uproar over architectural flights of fancy, one which even included a swimming pool, the contest was scrapped and the spire, roof and medieval wooden beams are all to be rebuilt as faithfully as possible to the original designs.
However, the same cannot be said for the interior given current plans, seen by The Telegraph and two European media outlets.
In June, the Archbishop of Paris, Michel Aupetit, said these would “bring the cathedral into the 21st century while preserving its own identity in the spirit of the Christian tradition”.
However, the plans presented by Father Gilles Drouin, the interior will look to the future, not the past.
Under the proposals, visitors will pass through the main entrance and be shepherded towards 14 themed chapels depicting Genesis, Abraham, Exodus and the Prophets but also the five continents.
**While Africa and Asia will have pride of place, Europe, the Americas and Oceania will either be less evident behind the apse or totally absent.** The tour ends at a chapel dedicated to “reconciled creation”, namely environmentalism as set out in Pope Francis’ Laudato Si’ encyclical.
The idea, said Mr Drouin, was to teach a captive audience of 12 million visitors with “multiple motivations” and very little Catholic culture the basics of Christianity and the history of salvation without turning it into “catechism in the heavy sense of the word”.
On Wednesday, he confirmed that the plans were “more than ever on the table”.
Christian Rousselot, the director general of the Notre-Dame Foundation, in charge of handling the lion’s share of donations, also confirmed proposals for a “visitors’ discovery trail” to “provide the keys to half the planet that doesn’t know what a cathedral is”.
“This trail going from North to South from the shadow to the light will depict the major moments of the Bible to explain in the most intelligible to common mortals, whether Chinese or Swedish, what it all means.”
He also confirmed that the proposal to project foreign phrases on the walls.
“Foreign visitors see signs and magnificent paintings but don’t understand a thing. Images and sculptures and paintings count but so do words. So there are plans to project on certain words and expressions in Mandarin, French or Spanish and English.”
A call for €6 million (£5 million) in donations above and beyond those collected so far was launched in June for the internal restoration, he said.
Prof Maria Luisa Ceccarelli Lemut, an Italian expert at Pisa University said: “One should simply conduct restoration and not choose solutions that could alter the architectural layout or arbitrarily ‘modernise’ the edifice.”
The senior source said that spending money to modify those parts of the interior risks eating into those used to restore Notre-Dame’s flying buttresses and sacristy, in dire need of repair even before the fire.
“When you see the seriousness with which the cathedral is being restored using top craftsmen and first-rate materials, this seems totally inappropriate,” said Mr Culot.
“Viollet-le-Duc had well understood one could add notes that didn’t exist but on condition to do it in the spirit of the original and not in a sort of ridiculous rupture that will go out of fashion in three years.”
The plans also include the possibility of storing benches underground thanks to a “goods elevator”, which would require knocking a hole in the 18th century crypt designed by Jacques-Germain Soufflot, who built Paris’ Pantheon, “an aberration”.
An even more controversial proposal to remove the stained glass windows designed by Viollet-le-Duc from the chapels and replace them with modern ones has been ruled out, he confirmed.
In his presentation, Mr Drouin also mentioned lighting and sound effects that will take visitors “from the darkness to the light”.
According to the senior source, the majority of members of the scientific committee overlooking the restoration are sceptical of the plans but Gen Georgelin and the Paris Archbishop are keen to press ahead at a crucial meeting of France’s national heritage commission on December 9.
This is a European cultural icon. It does not need to showcase other cultures. It should be a celebration of our culture and history. This is deplorable.
I’m not religious at all, but why not restore it like it was? Isn’t that what people go there to see? There are plenty of other ways to learn the basics of Catholicism without making it like a theme park. Maybe a discreet QR code people can scan to learn more?
And, why the multiple languages? Maybe useful a decade or more ago, but now people can just point their phones at words in French and auto-translate with ease. I did this pre-covid in several countries with no problem – especially with menus and in supermarkets but it works anywhere. I can’t imagine there are many people who don’t understand French who can afford to visit Paris but don’t have smart phones.
Does this mean that we will have pseudo-strong female characters, gay couples and token *persons of color* in the paintings, statues and frescoes?
Well, if the original is gone…. why not take a modern take? Should they fake old frescos? That’s would be more ingenious in my opinion. The damage is done, the interior will be a reconstruction. No need to fake the same style that was there originally.
Why is it that conservatives think anything changing at all about anything = “woke”?
From the article it sounds like the church is very much on board with the design.
>Under the proposed changes, confessional boxes, altars and classical sculptures will be replaced with modern art murals, and new sound and light effects to create “emotional spaces”.
​
>After widespread uproar over architectural flights of fancy, one which even included a swimming pool, the contest was scrapped and the spire, roof and medieval wooden beams are all to be rebuilt as faithfully as possible to the original designs.
>
>However, the same cannot be said for the interior given current plans, seen by The Telegraph and two European media outlets.
>
>In June, the Archbishop of Paris, Michel Aupetit, said these would “bring the cathedral into the 21st century while preserving its own identity in the spirit of the Christian tradition”.
Have they ever considered the thought that Notre Dame’s attractiveness in the eyes of its spectators is due to the fact that it **doesn’t** resemble the art and architecture typical of the 21st century?
“Foreign visitors see signs and magnificent paintings but don’t understand a thing. Images and sculptures and paintings count but so do words. So there are plans to project on certain words and expressions in Mandarin, French or Spanish and English.”
But… they had pamphlets and museum label type explainers in all sorts of languages, how are a few foreign maxims projected onto a wall going to meaningfully better that? It’s a gimmick.
Is this just a fringe proposal or is there an actual chance this might happen?
As someone who doesn’t hate Western civilization, I of course strongly disapprove of “woke” post-modern social-Marxists and I’m sure they get some kind of satisfaction from replacing another religion with their own, but giving attention to a mentally ill minority just empowers them.
Horrible. Restore it to the way it was.
Wanna bet this news is a duck?
Lets be honest, as long as this is judt a proposal, i doubt it will be something that will happen.
No sane european government will want to face the outrage for pretty much no real gain.
At least thats what I believe. Please dont prove me wrong we must be better than this. I have to hope at least
I thought it was actual church, recognised across the world for a beauty of it’s architecture and interior, not an amusement park?
13 comments
Paris’s fire-ravaged Notre-Dame cathedral risks resembling a “politically correct Disneyland” under controversial plans for its renovation seen by The Telegraph.
Critics have warned that the world-famous cathedral will be turned into an “experimental showroom” under plans to dramatically change the inside of the medieval building.
Under the proposed changes, confessional boxes, altars and classical sculptures will be replaced with modern art murals, and new sound and light effects to create “emotional spaces”.
There will be themed chapels on a “discovery trail”, with an emphasis on Africa and Asia, while quotes from the Bible will be projected onto chapel walls in various languages, including Mandarin.
The final chapel on the trail will have a strong environmental emphasis.
“It’s as if Disney were entering Notre-Dame,” said Maurice Culot, a prize-winning Paris-based architect, urbanist, theorist and critic who has seen the plans
“What they are proposing to do to Notre-Dame would never be done to Westminster Abbey or Saint Peter’s in Rome. It’s a kind of theme park and very childish and trivial given the grandeur of the place,” he told The Telegraph.
A senior source close to the renovation said that the plans risked turning the global beacon of Christianity into an “experimental showroom” that would “mutilate” the work of Eugene Viollet-le-Duc, the celebrated architect who restored the cathedral following the ravishes of the French Revolution in an effort to recapture the spirit of Medieval Christianity.
“Can you imagine the administration of the Holy See allowing something like this in the Sistine Chapel?,” said the senior source with access to the latest plans. “It would be unimaginable. We are not in an empty space here.
“This is political correctness gone mad. They want to turn Notre-Dame into an experimental liturgical showroom that exists nowhere else whereas it should be a landmark where the slightest change must be handled with great care.”
A global wave of emotion saw 340,000 donors contribute €833 million (£705 million) to restoring the iconic edifice. Some €165 million (£140 million) had already been spent by September on securing the cathedral, which was structurally damaged during the fire. A second chunk of €262.6 million (£222 million) in donations will go towards phase one of restoration work.
Jean-Louis Georgelin, the general who President Emmanuel Macron tasked with rebuilding Notre-Dame, has pledged that it will be sufficiently restored to stage a Te Deum on April 16 2024, in time for the Olympic Games in Paris.
Initially Edouard Philippe, the French prime minister at the time, said he would launch an international competition to rebuild the destroyed roof and spire, potentially with a modern design “that bears the mark of our time”.
After widespread uproar over architectural flights of fancy, one which even included a swimming pool, the contest was scrapped and the spire, roof and medieval wooden beams are all to be rebuilt as faithfully as possible to the original designs.
However, the same cannot be said for the interior given current plans, seen by The Telegraph and two European media outlets.
In June, the Archbishop of Paris, Michel Aupetit, said these would “bring the cathedral into the 21st century while preserving its own identity in the spirit of the Christian tradition”.
However, the plans presented by Father Gilles Drouin, the interior will look to the future, not the past.
Under the proposals, visitors will pass through the main entrance and be shepherded towards 14 themed chapels depicting Genesis, Abraham, Exodus and the Prophets but also the five continents.
**While Africa and Asia will have pride of place, Europe, the Americas and Oceania will either be less evident behind the apse or totally absent.** The tour ends at a chapel dedicated to “reconciled creation”, namely environmentalism as set out in Pope Francis’ Laudato Si’ encyclical.
The idea, said Mr Drouin, was to teach a captive audience of 12 million visitors with “multiple motivations” and very little Catholic culture the basics of Christianity and the history of salvation without turning it into “catechism in the heavy sense of the word”.
On Wednesday, he confirmed that the plans were “more than ever on the table”.
Christian Rousselot, the director general of the Notre-Dame Foundation, in charge of handling the lion’s share of donations, also confirmed proposals for a “visitors’ discovery trail” to “provide the keys to half the planet that doesn’t know what a cathedral is”.
“This trail going from North to South from the shadow to the light will depict the major moments of the Bible to explain in the most intelligible to common mortals, whether Chinese or Swedish, what it all means.”
He also confirmed that the proposal to project foreign phrases on the walls.
“Foreign visitors see signs and magnificent paintings but don’t understand a thing. Images and sculptures and paintings count but so do words. So there are plans to project on certain words and expressions in Mandarin, French or Spanish and English.”
A call for €6 million (£5 million) in donations above and beyond those collected so far was launched in June for the internal restoration, he said.
Prof Maria Luisa Ceccarelli Lemut, an Italian expert at Pisa University said: “One should simply conduct restoration and not choose solutions that could alter the architectural layout or arbitrarily ‘modernise’ the edifice.”
The senior source said that spending money to modify those parts of the interior risks eating into those used to restore Notre-Dame’s flying buttresses and sacristy, in dire need of repair even before the fire.
“When you see the seriousness with which the cathedral is being restored using top craftsmen and first-rate materials, this seems totally inappropriate,” said Mr Culot.
“Viollet-le-Duc had well understood one could add notes that didn’t exist but on condition to do it in the spirit of the original and not in a sort of ridiculous rupture that will go out of fashion in three years.”
The plans also include the possibility of storing benches underground thanks to a “goods elevator”, which would require knocking a hole in the 18th century crypt designed by Jacques-Germain Soufflot, who built Paris’ Pantheon, “an aberration”.
An even more controversial proposal to remove the stained glass windows designed by Viollet-le-Duc from the chapels and replace them with modern ones has been ruled out, he confirmed.
In his presentation, Mr Drouin also mentioned lighting and sound effects that will take visitors “from the darkness to the light”.
According to the senior source, the majority of members of the scientific committee overlooking the restoration are sceptical of the plans but Gen Georgelin and the Paris Archbishop are keen to press ahead at a crucial meeting of France’s national heritage commission on December 9.
This is a European cultural icon. It does not need to showcase other cultures. It should be a celebration of our culture and history. This is deplorable.
*Relevant Simpsons:*
https://youtu.be/gggCcXroOcc?t=132
I’m not religious at all, but why not restore it like it was? Isn’t that what people go there to see? There are plenty of other ways to learn the basics of Catholicism without making it like a theme park. Maybe a discreet QR code people can scan to learn more?
And, why the multiple languages? Maybe useful a decade or more ago, but now people can just point their phones at words in French and auto-translate with ease. I did this pre-covid in several countries with no problem – especially with menus and in supermarkets but it works anywhere. I can’t imagine there are many people who don’t understand French who can afford to visit Paris but don’t have smart phones.
Does this mean that we will have pseudo-strong female characters, gay couples and token *persons of color* in the paintings, statues and frescoes?
Well, if the original is gone…. why not take a modern take? Should they fake old frescos? That’s would be more ingenious in my opinion. The damage is done, the interior will be a reconstruction. No need to fake the same style that was there originally.
Why is it that conservatives think anything changing at all about anything = “woke”?
From the article it sounds like the church is very much on board with the design.
>Under the proposed changes, confessional boxes, altars and classical sculptures will be replaced with modern art murals, and new sound and light effects to create “emotional spaces”.
​
>After widespread uproar over architectural flights of fancy, one which even included a swimming pool, the contest was scrapped and the spire, roof and medieval wooden beams are all to be rebuilt as faithfully as possible to the original designs.
>
>However, the same cannot be said for the interior given current plans, seen by The Telegraph and two European media outlets.
>
>In June, the Archbishop of Paris, Michel Aupetit, said these would “bring the cathedral into the 21st century while preserving its own identity in the spirit of the Christian tradition”.
Have they ever considered the thought that Notre Dame’s attractiveness in the eyes of its spectators is due to the fact that it **doesn’t** resemble the art and architecture typical of the 21st century?
“Foreign visitors see signs and magnificent paintings but don’t understand a thing. Images and sculptures and paintings count but so do words. So there are plans to project on certain words and expressions in Mandarin, French or Spanish and English.”
But… they had pamphlets and museum label type explainers in all sorts of languages, how are a few foreign maxims projected onto a wall going to meaningfully better that? It’s a gimmick.
Is this just a fringe proposal or is there an actual chance this might happen?
As someone who doesn’t hate Western civilization, I of course strongly disapprove of “woke” post-modern social-Marxists and I’m sure they get some kind of satisfaction from replacing another religion with their own, but giving attention to a mentally ill minority just empowers them.
Horrible. Restore it to the way it was.
Wanna bet this news is a duck?
Lets be honest, as long as this is judt a proposal, i doubt it will be something that will happen.
No sane european government will want to face the outrage for pretty much no real gain.
At least thats what I believe. Please dont prove me wrong we must be better than this. I have to hope at least
I thought it was actual church, recognised across the world for a beauty of it’s architecture and interior, not an amusement park?