American report telling us no new facts other than the writer had column inches to fill.
The headline, “New COVID variant possibly 500 percent less infectious than Delta”, is equally valid but not nearly as sensational.
Back to square one.
You have another chance of making a success of it. Will you let the virus win another round?
Are people capable of learning from past mistakes?
How many more percents are there when Delta was 500% already?
Let us all die together!
MFW I get the 27th biweekly booster of the two-dose Pfizer vaccine.
If it’s more infectious, is it also more deadly? Because I’d much prefer an infectious and harmless variant. It’s what we eventually selected for the flu, by killing the others.
Happy Covid 21 everyone (fml it’s been almost 2 years of this now)
COVID-19: Ordeal of the Antivaxxer.
Covid taking notes from Fast and the Furious. Loads of them, never ending and each one worse than the last.
Maybe 5000%, possibly
we were like brrrr, but the new virus said at the door:
“Omae wa… mou shindeiru”
and we were like pikachu face: “NANI?!”
I find this hilarious and saddening
I had COVID and then got 2 doses of Moderna, that’s it for me. You can shove your variants and endless boosters up your ass.
Oh no! Anyway…
The guy they are reporting from. He has been criticised for being a doomer, and is not an expert on infectious diseases.
“Since this professional experience and research work are not in infectious disease epidemiology, the subfield most relevant to COVID-19, Feigl-Ding has been criticized for offering viral social media and other media commentary on the COVID-19 pandemic.”
“But his expertise is in nutrition, not infectious disease, meaning that he makes “no original contributions to analysis of this epidemic & is laser-focused on self-promotion”, pointed out Professor Lipsitch on Twitter.”
16 comments
Lmao.
Covid: “This is boring. Let’s raise the stakes”.
American report telling us no new facts other than the writer had column inches to fill.
The headline, “New COVID variant possibly 500 percent less infectious than Delta”, is equally valid but not nearly as sensational.
Back to square one.
You have another chance of making a success of it. Will you let the virus win another round?
Are people capable of learning from past mistakes?
How many more percents are there when Delta was 500% already?
Let us all die together!
MFW I get the 27th biweekly booster of the two-dose Pfizer vaccine.
If it’s more infectious, is it also more deadly? Because I’d much prefer an infectious and harmless variant. It’s what we eventually selected for the flu, by killing the others.
Happy Covid 21 everyone (fml it’s been almost 2 years of this now)
COVID-19: Ordeal of the Antivaxxer.
Covid taking notes from Fast and the Furious. Loads of them, never ending and each one worse than the last.
Maybe 5000%, possibly
we were like brrrr, but the new virus said at the door:
“Omae wa… mou shindeiru”
and we were like pikachu face: “NANI?!”
I find this hilarious and saddening
I had COVID and then got 2 doses of Moderna, that’s it for me. You can shove your variants and endless boosters up your ass.
Oh no! Anyway…
The guy they are reporting from. He has been criticised for being a doomer, and is not an expert on infectious diseases.
“Since this professional experience and research work are not in infectious disease epidemiology, the subfield most relevant to COVID-19, Feigl-Ding has been criticized for offering viral social media and other media commentary on the COVID-19 pandemic.”
From wiki, but these are the sources
​
[https://undark.org/2020/11/25/complicated-rise-of-eric-feigl-ding/](https://undark.org/2020/11/25/complicated-rise-of-eric-feigl-ding/)
[https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/who-qualifies-real-expert-when-it-comes-coronavirus](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/who-qualifies-real-expert-when-it-comes-coronavirus)
​
From second article
​
“But his expertise is in nutrition, not infectious disease, meaning that he makes “no original contributions to analysis of this epidemic & is laser-focused on self-promotion”, pointed out Professor Lipsitch on Twitter.”