No mention of how do we know she’s trafficking survivor, aside of her own claims.
I see no reason why she should be treated any differently from a male asylum seeker. I wish her the best with rebuilding her life in Rwanda.
Hasn’t everyone who entered by small boat across the channel technically been “trafficked”?
>While the Home Office has not ruled out sending women and children to Rwanda alongside men, this is the first time a woman is thought to have been issued with a notice of intent. Those earmarked for the first flight were all male.
other than provoking people, whats the point in pulling identity politics bullshit into the headline?
5 comments
Disgusting. All of it is, but this especially.
No mention of how do we know she’s trafficking survivor, aside of her own claims.
I see no reason why she should be treated any differently from a male asylum seeker. I wish her the best with rebuilding her life in Rwanda.
Hasn’t everyone who entered by small boat across the channel technically been “trafficked”?
>While the Home Office has not ruled out sending women and children to Rwanda alongside men, this is the first time a woman is thought to have been issued with a notice of intent. Those earmarked for the first flight were all male.
other than provoking people, whats the point in pulling identity politics bullshit into the headline?