Why are “comments restricted?” This is frightful, btw.
Trying the old motte and bailey fallacy.
>Between 12-26 months of age, children will use the pronouns I (to refer the themselves) and it. Between 27-30 months, children will acquire the pronouns my, me, mine, and you. Between 31-34 months, children will use your, she, he, your, and we
I did a child linguistic development unit a long, long time ago. I find it a bit difficult to believe a child of 2, who does not yet have the ability to express the concepts of ‘he/she’ can really contemplate their gender identity.
Stonewall has completely lost the plot.
It seems we went from “You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – there’s something wrong with you, take off that dress” to:
“You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – great, you look fab” for only about five minutes before it became:
“You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – there’s something wrong with you, you might really be a girl”
The social conservatives and Stonewall both get it wrong. Diverse gender expression in kids is not a problem that needs to be solved. Just let them be.
>Stonewall shared an article
So we have an article about a what seems to be a retweet, no sources quoted, a series of opinions about the claim of a claim that an article exists, and then a sort of generic Stonewall bashing session.
One of the better illustrations on how the modern media works, what with us commenting on it as well now.
6 comments
A 2 year old can’t make a decision about anything
Why are “comments restricted?” This is frightful, btw.
Trying the old motte and bailey fallacy.
>Between 12-26 months of age, children will use the pronouns I (to refer the themselves) and it. Between 27-30 months, children will acquire the pronouns my, me, mine, and you. Between 31-34 months, children will use your, she, he, your, and we
I did a child linguistic development unit a long, long time ago. I find it a bit difficult to believe a child of 2, who does not yet have the ability to express the concepts of ‘he/she’ can really contemplate their gender identity.
Stonewall has completely lost the plot.
It seems we went from “You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – there’s something wrong with you, take off that dress” to:
“You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – great, you look fab” for only about five minutes before it became:
“You’re a little boy who likes wearing dresses – there’s something wrong with you, you might really be a girl”
The social conservatives and Stonewall both get it wrong. Diverse gender expression in kids is not a problem that needs to be solved. Just let them be.
>Stonewall shared an article
So we have an article about a what seems to be a retweet, no sources quoted, a series of opinions about the claim of a claim that an article exists, and then a sort of generic Stonewall bashing session.
One of the better illustrations on how the modern media works, what with us commenting on it as well now.