Sir you’ve identified a misspelling of a word in journalism. Report it to the gardaì.
Obviously nobody‘s perfect and mistakes and typos can sometimes get through, but a simple spell check would have caught this
“We need more taxpairs money”
This looks set to cause quite the rock us.
This has to be an IT Crowd reference. No-one can be this fucking dumb.
You should go to the doctor for that
Spellcheck isn’t rocket appliances.
I don’t want anything to do with that stool.
r/boneappletea
I don’t agree with that article at all.
The whole idea of “soulmate” isn’t to settle because theres nothing else out there but that what is out there simply isn’t up to the pitch or standards of that person your currently seeing.
Doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ll be with that person for life but it does mean that they have the core attributes, values and interests that you look for and need within long term relationships and there’s nothing wrong with knowing what you want and don’t want.
I think its a massive stretch to say what’s been written in the article and take it as a fact.
Not everybody is a walking red flag and sometimes if you focus too much on the minuscule negatives within dating you might miss out on the one massive positive that could potentially define a relationship.
I believe that whole article to be a damp squid
Ouch
OMG let’s post the typo to the Ireland sub so we can all moan and be even more miserable
I’ve the “deprecate/depreciate” conversation about once a week with the IT crowd at work.
14 comments
Pedal stool. Mobility scooter.
Sir you’ve identified a misspelling of a word in journalism. Report it to the gardaì.
Obviously nobody‘s perfect and mistakes and typos can sometimes get through, but a simple spell check would have caught this
“We need more taxpairs money”
This looks set to cause quite the rock us.
This has to be an IT Crowd reference. No-one can be this fucking dumb.
You should go to the doctor for that
Spellcheck isn’t rocket appliances.
I don’t want anything to do with that stool.
r/boneappletea
I don’t agree with that article at all.
The whole idea of “soulmate” isn’t to settle because theres nothing else out there but that what is out there simply isn’t up to the pitch or standards of that person your currently seeing.
Doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ll be with that person for life but it does mean that they have the core attributes, values and interests that you look for and need within long term relationships and there’s nothing wrong with knowing what you want and don’t want.
I think its a massive stretch to say what’s been written in the article and take it as a fact.
Not everybody is a walking red flag and sometimes if you focus too much on the minuscule negatives within dating you might miss out on the one massive positive that could potentially define a relationship.
I believe that whole article to be a damp squid
Ouch
OMG let’s post the typo to the Ireland sub so we can all moan and be even more miserable
I’ve the “deprecate/depreciate” conversation about once a week with the IT crowd at work.