As far as culture and traditions, there’s nothing Turkic in them. About DNA, all the Balkans have some Turkic/Asian genes, the Bulgarians are not different in any way.
Yes, I understand *some* words, because they are same in *Turkish*.
The narrator can’t pronounce properly words.
There are pure *arabic* words/sentences like: هو الحي **He [Allah] is alive** لا يموت **Not dead/ never will die** / و كل حي سيموت **and every alive [creature] soon will die.** / رحمة الله عليه **Let the mercy of Allah be upon him** …
This video is a mix of various steppe Turkic languages from later period, mostly Volga Tatar/kipchak, unrelated to the supposed Bulgar language which remains unattested and theoretical.
There are almost 7 centuries passed, and still I can understand a lot:
İdil/İtil (volga) Turkic: Atil suvi aka turur
Anatolian Turkish: İdil/İtil suyu aka durur
İT: Kaya tübi kaka turur
AT: Kaya dibi kaka durur
İT: Balık talim baka turur
AT: Balık … baka durur…
What kind of a stupid question, OP? You’re asking Slavic speakers if they understand a Turkic language.
a da ti shibna edin turkic v anusa iskash li
The problem with reconstructed old languages is that they are, well, reconstructed. That said, we speak Slavic language nowadays. And even if some words are familiar, that is probably due to the words existing in Turkish, not becouse of some remnants of the old language.
8 comments
Yes, Bulgarians have Turkic heritage
As far as culture and traditions, there’s nothing Turkic in them. About DNA, all the Balkans have some Turkic/Asian genes, the Bulgarians are not different in any way.
Yes, I understand *some* words, because they are same in *Turkish*.
The narrator can’t pronounce properly words.
There are pure *arabic* words/sentences like: هو الحي **He [Allah] is alive** لا يموت **Not dead/ never will die** / و كل حي سيموت **and every alive [creature] soon will die.** / رحمة الله عليه **Let the mercy of Allah be upon him** …
This video is a mix of various steppe Turkic languages from later period, mostly Volga Tatar/kipchak, unrelated to the supposed Bulgar language which remains unattested and theoretical.
There are almost 7 centuries passed, and still I can understand a lot:
İdil/İtil (volga) Turkic: Atil suvi aka turur
Anatolian Turkish: İdil/İtil suyu aka durur
İT: Kaya tübi kaka turur
AT: Kaya dibi kaka durur
İT: Balık talim baka turur
AT: Balık … baka durur…
What kind of a stupid question, OP? You’re asking Slavic speakers if they understand a Turkic language.
a da ti shibna edin turkic v anusa iskash li
The problem with reconstructed old languages is that they are, well, reconstructed. That said, we speak Slavic language nowadays. And even if some words are familiar, that is probably due to the words existing in Turkish, not becouse of some remnants of the old language.