**The German Economic Institute forecasts an almost €18 billion shortfall next year despite a boost in spending.**
Germany will fall short of its pledge to spend 2 percent of its GDP on its military, a leading economic think tank warned on Monday.
Europe’s largest economy has committed to ramping up spending to meet the NATO-set target after years of neglect, going so far as to set up a €100 billion special fund to strengthen its military.
Calling the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February a historic turning point, Chancellor Olaf Scholz said in its wake that there was a clear need “to invest significantly more in the security of our country in order to protect our freedom and our democracy.”
But the German Economic Institute, a Cologne-based think tank, said that Berlin isn’t on course to hit the 2 percent benchmark despite the boost in funding. In a report, the institute notes that no extra cash has been committed for this year. Meanwhile in 2023, it sees a near-€18 billion shortfall despite an increase in outlays.
Government spending will continue to come just below target until 2027. At that point the special fund will be either used up, and defense spending will fall back to around 1.2 percent of GDP. If it’s still not all spent, then the preceding years will come in even further below target.
The €100-billion fund was created to bypass Germany’s constitutionally enshrined debt brake. But the Cologne think tank writes that political commitments — which rule out tax hikes or cuts elsewhere while upholding the debt break in its current form — remain too restrictive for Germany to meet its defense spending commitments.
even with the weapons sent to ukraine?
Not a surprise, sincerely.
Weaseling themselves out once again. What size of fish does it take to slap German politicians into reality?
Do they think Germany, or even NATO of which Germany is a contributor, will never be in the crosshairs? Being weak is what tempts such aggressions, therefore, even though military spending is a regrettable thing in general, **it’s necessary thing to avoid war and reduce conflict.**
If you are strong, no one will even try to punch you. Putin went so far, because the west were extremely passive and lenient in Chechnya, in Georgia, in Crimea, in Donbas. And dare I say so, we can still do much more in Ukraine.
If we had proper armies, and the proper attitude, it would never go this far.
Is there really anyone that is surprised?
To be fair, you can’t ramp up military spending that fast. Or, you can by just burning money for no effect.
So basically the fuzz is about something that hasnt happened yet since this is about spending of 2023 and springer just continues the continual dirt-campaign that it perpetually runs.
7 comments
**The German Economic Institute forecasts an almost €18 billion shortfall next year despite a boost in spending.**
Germany will fall short of its pledge to spend 2 percent of its GDP on its military, a leading economic think tank warned on Monday.
Europe’s largest economy has committed to ramping up spending to meet the NATO-set target after years of neglect, going so far as to set up a €100 billion special fund to strengthen its military.
Calling the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February a historic turning point, Chancellor Olaf Scholz said in its wake that there was a clear need “to invest significantly more in the security of our country in order to protect our freedom and our democracy.”
But the German Economic Institute, a Cologne-based think tank, said that Berlin isn’t on course to hit the 2 percent benchmark despite the boost in funding. In a report, the institute notes that no extra cash has been committed for this year. Meanwhile in 2023, it sees a near-€18 billion shortfall despite an increase in outlays.
Government spending will continue to come just below target until 2027. At that point the special fund will be either used up, and defense spending will fall back to around 1.2 percent of GDP. If it’s still not all spent, then the preceding years will come in even further below target.
The €100-billion fund was created to bypass Germany’s constitutionally enshrined debt brake. But the Cologne think tank writes that political commitments — which rule out tax hikes or cuts elsewhere while upholding the debt break in its current form — remain too restrictive for Germany to meet its defense spending commitments.
even with the weapons sent to ukraine?
Not a surprise, sincerely.
Weaseling themselves out once again. What size of fish does it take to slap German politicians into reality?
Do they think Germany, or even NATO of which Germany is a contributor, will never be in the crosshairs? Being weak is what tempts such aggressions, therefore, even though military spending is a regrettable thing in general, **it’s necessary thing to avoid war and reduce conflict.**
If you are strong, no one will even try to punch you. Putin went so far, because the west were extremely passive and lenient in Chechnya, in Georgia, in Crimea, in Donbas. And dare I say so, we can still do much more in Ukraine.
If we had proper armies, and the proper attitude, it would never go this far.
Is there really anyone that is surprised?
To be fair, you can’t ramp up military spending that fast. Or, you can by just burning money for no effect.
So basically the fuzz is about something that hasnt happened yet since this is about spending of 2023 and springer just continues the continual dirt-campaign that it perpetually runs.