Interesting device/model. I scooted through the published article/journal and was surprised that there was no consideration for flow rate or volume (physical) to determine said flow rate. Is this normal for this area of research? I ask as someone who has experience in fluid mechanics and design and fabrication of batteries. Fluid mechanics was the difference in success and failure for us in that field, I would have imagined it would be similar for this type of research too? To be fair I probably missed this in the results and I apologise if I did. Please excuse my ignorance.
Anyhow, thanks for linking the article OP. I like reading success stories =)
1 comment
Interesting device/model. I scooted through the published article/journal and was surprised that there was no consideration for flow rate or volume (physical) to determine said flow rate. Is this normal for this area of research? I ask as someone who has experience in fluid mechanics and design and fabrication of batteries. Fluid mechanics was the difference in success and failure for us in that field, I would have imagined it would be similar for this type of research too? To be fair I probably missed this in the results and I apologise if I did. Please excuse my ignorance.
Anyhow, thanks for linking the article OP. I like reading success stories =)