“EU” and “Efficient” have no room in the same sentence other than with the words “Is” and “Not” between them.
Wait. Only 13% agreed to “it’s inefficient”?
I would have expected it to be inverse 😮
“Promotes democractic values” when EU citizens literally can’t vote on a single EU bill. The recent chat control law (draft) would NEVER have any chance, had the actual citizen had any say in it. But because the average MEP is a 50 year old boomer who soys out over strawmanned “muh CP”, they happily enact their mass surveillance.
If an institution founded for promoting peace and cooperation, is delivering exactly that; I’d say it’s highly efficient.
We need to be clear what we are talking about, or we end up having endless conversations about how a square compares to a circle.
Its bizzare that Poland has one of the most pro-ue populations in Europe and at the same time it is ruled by an anti-eu party
6 comments
[Source](https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/06/22/spotlight-on-poland-negative-views-of-russia-surge-but-ratings-for-u-s-nato-eu-improve/)
“EU” and “Efficient” have no room in the same sentence other than with the words “Is” and “Not” between them.
Wait. Only 13% agreed to “it’s inefficient”?
I would have expected it to be inverse 😮
“Promotes democractic values” when EU citizens literally can’t vote on a single EU bill. The recent chat control law (draft) would NEVER have any chance, had the actual citizen had any say in it. But because the average MEP is a 50 year old boomer who soys out over strawmanned “muh CP”, they happily enact their mass surveillance.
If an institution founded for promoting peace and cooperation, is delivering exactly that; I’d say it’s highly efficient.
We need to be clear what we are talking about, or we end up having endless conversations about how a square compares to a circle.
Its bizzare that Poland has one of the most pro-ue populations in Europe and at the same time it is ruled by an anti-eu party