>Half of the 20,000 homes planned will be classified as affordable – a higher proportion than many other developers achieve. A big chunk – about a third of the housing – will be for rent.
More build to rent coming to London.
Is this a good thing?
Does this include barking riverside or not atm?
That’s good. I hope TfL doesn’t come under pressure to sell of its land to the private sector by the Government
“Affordable” lol. To who?
20,000 homes that are priced way outside of what anyone can pay for, defined as affordable by a government whose definition of the word isn’t exactly “affordable”. Just more bullshit masquerading as good news.
imagine instead of actually building something they just moor up a ship on the Thames and make an IRL version of Rivet City from Fallout 3
6 comments
>Half of the 20,000 homes planned will be classified as affordable – a higher proportion than many other developers achieve. A big chunk – about a third of the housing – will be for rent.
More build to rent coming to London.
Is this a good thing?
Does this include barking riverside or not atm?
That’s good. I hope TfL doesn’t come under pressure to sell of its land to the private sector by the Government
“Affordable” lol. To who?
20,000 homes that are priced way outside of what anyone can pay for, defined as affordable by a government whose definition of the word isn’t exactly “affordable”. Just more bullshit masquerading as good news.
imagine instead of actually building something they just moor up a ship on the Thames and make an IRL version of Rivet City from Fallout 3