Such bull. They came down on the side of the most conservative interpretation of the law which happens to be protective of the dozens of FG/FF/Greenies who applied for exemptions from the basic influence-peddling rules. It’s corruption-tolerant at least.
You know the way privatizing national infrastructure and resources makes us vulnerable to external influence and in turn reduces our ability to act as a sovereign nation?
Why isn’t it considered treason? Wouldn’t ‘economic treason’ be a better word for lobbying?
2 comments
Such bull. They came down on the side of the most conservative interpretation of the law which happens to be protective of the dozens of FG/FF/Greenies who applied for exemptions from the basic influence-peddling rules. It’s corruption-tolerant at least.
You know the way privatizing national infrastructure and resources makes us vulnerable to external influence and in turn reduces our ability to act as a sovereign nation?
Why isn’t it considered treason? Wouldn’t ‘economic treason’ be a better word for lobbying?