If the Greek Cypriots abolish the bi-zonal bi-communal federation to make the Turkish Cypriots a minority after Cyprus is united, then will the EU prevent it?

13 comments

  1. You have patience dude (but you have to admit, this one isn’t even close to the worse one)

  2. Some non-BBF supporting ( mostly ELAM) GCs just wanna make Cyprus like Turkey.

    “having the Kurds as minority that vote only their one political party, be discriminated, ending up forming separatist movements that turn violent, the government Labelling them as terrorists and forming a even worst bias towards the minority, not admitting their shit and trying to cover it up by censor everything nor replying to the criticism” type of Turkey.

  3. Why is the bi-zonal bi-communal federation proposal permanent, strengthened and its constitution unalterable? Is it because the UN bi-zonal bi-communal federation proposal is permanent, strengthened and the constitution is unalterable?

  4. A United Cyprus member of the EU and the Eurozone is the best prospect for the future of young generations of all communities living in Cyprus. Regarding governance We do not need to reinvent the wheel!! Switzerland is a federation !!Germany is a federation !!

    ![gif](giphy|jU2IAEtFVGBDMu2vWg)

  5. Just playing around interests of imperialism… We either have democracy or we manipulate the state so someone can handle the majority… And we conveniently call it (New Type of Democracy). BBF is just another type of Imvros Tenedos plan. Thats the Turkish… You could get some references from Ahmed Davudoglu book STRATEJIK DERINLIK // TURKIYE ‘NIN ULUSLARARASI KONUMU

  6. Meme makers are the backbone of our new society. Either put them at the bottom (foundation of internet society) or at the top (gods amongst men). There is no inbetween.

  7. Bizonal bicommunal federation is the only possible pathway for a peaceful reunification of the island based on the history and the reality formed by the bicommunal clashes since 1958
    Obviously the bizonal bicommunal character will be part of the constitution so no community can alter it, and we shall assume that we learn from the mistakes of the past and not attempt to do so.
    Given that in order for any policy to pass a positive vote from both communities must be given ( which is much better than te veto of the 60s constitution) it means that the island will work on a basis of cooperation and consensus rather than imposing the will of the majority.

    Of course any discussion on a bicommunal federation is in the realm of fantasy since the ruling class in both communities favors permanent division of the island and that’s were we are heading with Anastasiadis (and at least two of his possible successors) and Tatar

  9. in Cyprus there are minority communities, Russian, Swedish, English, Italian, Filipino and so forth.

    what is the difference between them and the Turkish Cypriots?

    simply open the place up completely, complete unification, and if a fellow from Zimbabwe wants to be president then he could be if secured the votes.

  10. It is established with a good constitution and cannot be abolished if there is real equality. My proposal is let’s leave the concepts of Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot and switch to the concept of “Mediterraneanism”. The Two communities on the island are an ultranationalist society. There is no solution without compromise.

    Both communities are victims of the British “divide and rule” strategy. Why don’t we first find a solution about the British who should not have a say on the island? We know that the main trigger of these conflicts was the British. In 1955, they moved from the concept of problem to the position of referee. Am I wrong?

  11. One think everyone forgets is that it’s 2022 and not 1974 and the Turkish speaking Cypriots are not 18/20 % any more but 40/45% now

Leave a Reply