Open Vld wil indexsprong op lonen van politici: “Al 600 euro per maand meer, daar kan je al eens iets mee doen”

21 comments
  1. Lol after they got their 10%, they want to do an ‘index sprong’.

    They are guestimating we are at peak inflation?

    Only if they block indexation for a year, would it mean something. Maybe then they would start working on getting inflation down.

    It’s all theater, folks.

    Up next, we took an index jump, now it’s your turn.

    Veauxriens, tous.

  2. Dubbel gevoel:

    * Mensen begrijpen indexsprong niet. Ja, PC200 (en andere) zullen evenveel index moeten krijgen als iedereen. De sprong zal op een ander moment moeten komen en voor iedereen van toepassing zijn
    * Uitzondering voor politiek zou een mooi signaal zijn, maar een druppel op een hete plaat
    * Index systeem is uniek in de wereld, met voor- en nadelen. Als grote verdiener ga ik een mooie loonsverhoging tegemoet die in mijn geval 100% extra sparen betekent. Index netto betalen en loonkost beperken, of beperken tot de eerste €x bruto zou logischer zijn (of algemeen afschaffen, maar daar zal geen draagvlak voor te vinden zijn).

  3. This article has hundreds of negative reactions on FB within an hour. Hundreds of people who don’t understand an indexsprong. Hundreds of people who think that Open Vld is asking to increase the salaries of our politicians, instead of halting an increase.

    **Our electorate is scarily misinformed.**

    GVA/Nieuwsblad are capitalizing on this by inserting the “Al 600 euro per maand meer, daar kan je al eens iets mee doen” quote in the title, to make it look like our politicians are so money hungry that they demand more money in times of crisis. That’s almost Fox News level of clickbait.

  4. – Politician proposing indexjump on their own wage is good. It means their wage won’t automatically increase next time.
    – The obvious play is the politician proposing next year that everyone’s wages will skip indexation and that they lead by example.
    – The real play is to avoid increasing wages faster than the loonnorm (i.e. faster than neighbouring countries), as proposed by the unions and probably next year by the PS by moving the Overton window prematurely in the other direction thereby making maintaining the status quo seems like they are compromising their own more ‘radical’ pov (that never had any chance of working). The unions will get to organise a global strike and reinforce their own popularity with the workers and nothing will change. Also the PS might refuse step 1 (because it cause a precedent) and the politician will be able to claim the PS are greedy.

  5. Index sprong.. so they are NOT applying the index when they could do so. If a politician doesn’t award himself something they are legally eligible for, it’s with a reason… I wonder what’s the play here

  6. Nieuwsblad, HLN, GVA, HBVL… Just erase these from existence plz. We need newspapers.. we already have enough magazines..

    De Story has better news than the “papers” mentioned above.

  7. I can already see the way this is going:

    -First: ‘indexsprong’ for politicians

    -Second: no indexation for high wage earners

    – Third: steadily decrease the income threshold until only the poorest see any indexation at all.

    -Fourth: wage campaign against the poor

    – Fifth: abolish the index all together

    It’s all just part of a cynical political theatre. Won’t be long before N-VA insists on a indexsprong for everyone… .

Leave a Reply