The following sentence – indeed, paragraph (or ‘paragraph’) – is garbled. ‘If voted against MPs risk losing the whip’ (*sic*). Today, journalistic writing is even worse than it used to be.
Great. If they can do that, why have they not the balls aka ethical morality to vote no confidence in their own government of libertarian anarchists, and therefore the dissolution of Parliament and for a general election 🗳?
Multiple Tory MPs attempt to retain their voters, in effort to save their own jobs- is what the headline should have read.
7 comments
Can someone enlighten me why this isn’t automatically a supply bill (and therefore an effective confidence motion)
Can’t the Lords also stop it? Wasn’t in the manifesto
I mean thats good.
But why only “parts”, as far as i can tell the whole things a mess.
They let it happen in the first place, give the power back to the people.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/619781
The following sentence – indeed, paragraph (or ‘paragraph’) – is garbled. ‘If voted against MPs risk losing the whip’ (*sic*). Today, journalistic writing is even worse than it used to be.
Great. If they can do that, why have they not the balls aka ethical morality to vote no confidence in their own government of libertarian anarchists, and therefore the dissolution of Parliament and for a general election 🗳?
Multiple Tory MPs attempt to retain their voters, in effort to save their own jobs- is what the headline should have read.