Anger as newspaper claims Liverpool has no significant culture

12 comments
  1. That’s a terribly misleading headline from the BBC.

    > Liverpool City Region’s mayor has demanded an apology after an article [int The Telegraph] claimed the city had no **cultural facilities** of “any great significance”.

    Whilst the Torygraph is a rag, that is a rather different statement to what the headline states.

  2. The article is not as bad is it seems. It gives great credit to Liverpool’s artistic history and says they’re both great cities but argues that Glasgow has the better cultural venues.

    Most importantly it’s written as an intentionally partisan argument for Glasgow to host Eurovision rather than an insult to Liverpool. It’s just a ‘my city is better than your city’ article where they’re competing for something.

    It may be unfair, it is a bit rude, but it seems an overreaction to be that upset about it.

    This:

    > Mayor Steve Rotheram said the comments were “outrageous”, adding: “We want a full retraction.”

    Is overkill IMO. Just laugh it off and have a jibe back at them.

  3. Clearly the Telegraph was on holiday when Liverpool was European Capital of Culture in 2008. Or, perhaps, they simply forgot to read their own articles from 2008.

  4. Lived there 8 years. This is the reason I left.

    Barely any theatres or museums.

    Music scene consistently missing big name acts.

    90% of boozers based around Carling.

    Football being 95% of all conversation.

    People on the whole totally stuck in a tiny world with no interest in new things. I got slaughtered at work mentioning I liked cous cous.

    Barely any festivals.

    There were a good number of decent restaurants though.

Leave a Reply