> Gazprom said Nord Stream 2’s ‘B’ line could still export gas to Europe, if a decision were made to start deliveries.
I guess we know who did it, then.
but that wont happen since its nordstream 2 and that pipeline will never be opened.
Is this a strange strategy of russia to “force” Germany to accept and open Nordstream2? A power game?
What a stupid strategy. We should set out for the future and carefully think if our money is it worth the fossile energy. Subventions should be clearly restricted and put into renewables.
How can a leat “just stop”? Did they fix it or not? If there is a leak, it will stay a leak until its fixed. The article makes it sound like the pipeline healed itself.
Or in other words – “Send your investigators down and we will blow this last line as well.”
When I was saying that I got downvoted to oblivion!
6 comments
> Gazprom said Nord Stream 2’s ‘B’ line could still export gas to Europe, if a decision were made to start deliveries.
I guess we know who did it, then.
but that wont happen since its nordstream 2 and that pipeline will never be opened.
Is this a strange strategy of russia to “force” Germany to accept and open Nordstream2? A power game?
What a stupid strategy. We should set out for the future and carefully think if our money is it worth the fossile energy. Subventions should be clearly restricted and put into renewables.
How can a leat “just stop”? Did they fix it or not? If there is a leak, it will stay a leak until its fixed. The article makes it sound like the pipeline healed itself.
Or in other words – “Send your investigators down and we will blow this last line as well.”
When I was saying that I got downvoted to oblivion!