>Mr Corbyn has paid no damages, has made no apology and has given no undertakings concerning repetition of the words complained of.
Haha. Basically looks like someone just looked at the guy and said “Come on, now…”
Funny way of saying, courts decides there was no case against Jeremy Corbyn
>Mr Millett argued that, although he was not named by Mr Corbyn, he was defamed because national media coverage before the broadcast made him identifiable to viewers as one of those referred to.
Yeah you aren’t going to win that one, even in the UK
3 comments
>Mr Corbyn has paid no damages, has made no apology and has given no undertakings concerning repetition of the words complained of.
Haha. Basically looks like someone just looked at the guy and said “Come on, now…”
Funny way of saying, courts decides there was no case against Jeremy Corbyn
>Mr Millett argued that, although he was not named by Mr Corbyn, he was defamed because national media coverage before the broadcast made him identifiable to viewers as one of those referred to.
Yeah you aren’t going to win that one, even in the UK