The man who single handedly disproved nominative determinism
Next: Truss calls general election because media doesn’t stop talking about it.
A boy can dream.
>”You guys were constantly talking about the 45p tax rate, which is why we had to take it away, so that us guys could talk about the 95 per cent of that package which was about cutting tax for working families, support for people trying to pay their energy bills, giving growth zones around the country, infrastructure investment for transport which unlocks the growth in the economy – that’s what we wanted to talk about and that’s what we will talk about.”
It’s annoying how they keep claiming the basic things that any sane government would have to do in a crisis as a shield as if they are somehow virtuous for it. Yes they provided support to stabilise the energy market but that’s literally one of the basic things that they are there for as the government of the country (although they apparently had to be forced into it). If they hadn’t then Labour would be 40 points ahead not 30 and we’d have mass protests.
The reason people want to talk about the other stuff rather than that is because these are the real choices they are making about the direction of the country not just patting them on the back for doing the basics. In this case these choices appear to be absolutely destroying our economy and that seems to deserve some discussion. That they can’t seem to understand that says a lot.
3 comments
The man who single handedly disproved nominative determinism
Next: Truss calls general election because media doesn’t stop talking about it.
A boy can dream.
>”You guys were constantly talking about the 45p tax rate, which is why we had to take it away, so that us guys could talk about the 95 per cent of that package which was about cutting tax for working families, support for people trying to pay their energy bills, giving growth zones around the country, infrastructure investment for transport which unlocks the growth in the economy – that’s what we wanted to talk about and that’s what we will talk about.”
It’s annoying how they keep claiming the basic things that any sane government would have to do in a crisis as a shield as if they are somehow virtuous for it. Yes they provided support to stabilise the energy market but that’s literally one of the basic things that they are there for as the government of the country (although they apparently had to be forced into it). If they hadn’t then Labour would be 40 points ahead not 30 and we’d have mass protests.
The reason people want to talk about the other stuff rather than that is because these are the real choices they are making about the direction of the country not just patting them on the back for doing the basics. In this case these choices appear to be absolutely destroying our economy and that seems to deserve some discussion. That they can’t seem to understand that says a lot.