Home Office threatens to send heavily pregnant rape survivor to Rwanda

8 comments
  1. > Linked cases are currently going through the courts, challenging the lawfulness of forcibly removing asylum seekers who arrived recently in the UK in small boats and claimed asylum to Rwanda.

    >The 28-year-old woman, who is 37 weeks pregnant, is in a state of acute distress about the threatened removal. Doctors say scans show her baby has stopped growing and that she may need to be induced.

    >Home Office officials were aware that she was pregnant when she arrived in the UK on a small boat in July and organised a pregnancy scan for her. Officials have also moved her from one hotel to another after she became unwell with pregnancy-related nausea in the first hotel.

    > The woman, who is using the pseudonym Delina, said she was “really frightened” about what might happen to her and her baby. She had been living in an informal refugee camp in Calais for eight months before travelling to the UK in a dinghy and was struggling to survive there as a homeless young woman, even before the rape occurred.

    >She has spent decades in search of safety. She fled Eritrea at the age of three with her mother after her father was killed by the government. Her mother took her first to Sudan and later to Lebanon. She has no family members left. “I have not been able to sleep since I got the Rwanda notice,” she said.

    >A recent report from the charity Medical Justice, which analysed the cases of 36 people threatened with removal to Rwanda, found that 26 showed evidence of torture, 15 showed evidence of PTSD and 11 had suicidal thoughts.

    >In a separate case a female trafficking victim was also threatened with removal to Rwanda.

    >“I knew about the Rwanda plan before I came to the UK but I had to come here because I was not safe in France because I was homeless,” said Delina. “I was shocked when I received the letter. I never thought I would get this when I was pregnant.

  2. >In a separate case a female trafficking victim was also threatened with removal to Rwanda.

    Anyone upset at Sturgeon calling this government detestable should reconsider their position.

  3. Yeah at this point you half expect them to twiddling their moustaches and stroking white cats.

    Only knowing them they would mess it up somehow.

  4. Basically clickbait

    > A Home Office spokesperson said: “We are urgently investigating this matter. However, very limited information has been provided to help us establish what has happened or identify the individual. But we are clear that every person in scope for removal to Rwanda will be individually assessed and no one will be transferred if it is unsafe for them.”

  5. Sudan is a failed state. It would certainly be nice to prioritize international supervision and partitioning of failed states at this point.

    Not just R.F. and P.R.C. / Peking , Brazil, Argentina, the state of Mexico, the state of India, but Burma, Afghanistan, Laos, Canada, Sudan, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, South Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Haiti.

    https://www.livemint.com/news/consistent-effort-to-taint-country-image-india-rejects-global-hunger-index-ranking-11665840666783.html

  6. I mean, if she isn’t mean to be here then that’s the bed she made herself. I’m sure France being the dangerous war-torn hell-hole it is would have been horrific for her and her baby.

Leave a Reply