Private renters stuck in dangerous homes

6 comments
  1. Those people who bemoan people *on benefits* having clothes with a brand name, a can of beer or a cigarette now and again, a *flat screeeen teee veeee* and a phone will like this one.

    I mean, if they don’t want poor people to have something that resembles a regular or habitable domestic living situation with the smallest of 21st century luxuries and items then I suppose this (or a shack, a tent?) Is what they *want* poverty to look like?

  2. Another reason for a landlord register and independent regulator that inspects properties on a regular basis. It’s a reciprocal relationship, so if landlords want protection from tenants then tenants should be guaranteed it from rogue landlords.

  3. We need to start reviewing our rentals. While there seems to be a couple of websites, they don’t seem to be used much.

    If I have to provide references, why don’t they?

  4. “Yeah, but I’d rather the derelict car park remain unbuilt on for the sake of neighbourhood character” – Your local planning meetings

Leave a Reply