Defining the ‘sub-polity’ that is Northern Ireland – The Irish Times

3 comments
  1. Great article that does not shy away from the apartheid nature and colonialism of ‘Northern Ireland’ and the very reasons why armed resistance was necessary.

    Of course Irish neo-IPPers and the British commentariat will never speak in the same emotive terms when it comes to state violence, but nonetheless, the truth is there.

  2. > However, unionists were well aware that any county by county plebiscite would leave them with only four counties that could carry a “supremacy” vote. Thus Fermanagh, Tyrone and Derry City were dragged in – and gerrymandered – to make up a viable “sub-polity”. 

    Worth remembering that free staters went along with this too. For a deal on debt.

    So essentially, sold off two counties.

  3. As a northerner, I’m not at all surprised people in the south didn’t always believe the extent of the official prejudice, systemic disadvantage, and state collusion in violence right up to the 90s: even if their parents and grandparents remembered British rule, it had *never* been as part of a cultural minority.

    It doesn’t require a disclaimer or caveat about the Troubles. The way people were treated was wrong. The supremacist views (that get a mainstream platform anyway) are still wrong.

Leave a Reply