!

25 comments
  1. What idiot thinks this?

    The reason Belgium still somewhat functions is because not everything needs to be agreed upon at federal level.

  2. Nice thought, but we all know that a single government would be just as inept as the dozen or so that we have now.

  3. the problem has zero to do with having many governments (no country has only one governing body).
    The problem is a lack of hiërarchie what makes us special.

  4. Comforting and simplistic idea, but alas, no, a return to unitary government wouldn’t somehow magically transform Belgium in a utopic society.

    There are real reasons for why subsidiarity is a Good Idea in the context of Belgium. Territorial, historical, cultural, sociolinguistic, sociodemographic differences are *real* and legitimize us inching from unitary government to federalism. People who outright dismiss these live in a fairy tale land that is not actual Belgium.

    Moreover, there is no reason that complicated nations, in the sense that they are federations with multiple levels of government, can be very, *very* successful. In fact, let’s think of some counterexamples.

    Australia? Awesome quality of life. Federation.

    Germany? Closer to home. Economic powerhouse of the EU. A federation.

    USA? Probably the most well known federation, and economically the most successful nation since the industrial age.

    Switzerland? Beacon of prosperity and peace and very much a complicated federation.

    All of these nations share the same fundamental characteristics of governance with Belgium: a “complicated” system of governments with matters divided between the federal government and the individual regional governments. They have multiple election cycles. The number of political mandates is roughly proportional to the number of governments, so “a lot of” politicians yeah.

    So why hasn’t Belgian federalism succeeded as well as it could have? Well, it might have something to do with the fact that unlike all (?) other federations on the face of this planet, we retrofitted it onto a constitution that was written for a unitary government. We got to independence through revolution, and from thereon moved to a form of federalism through political strife and incrementalism.

    Instead of starting from a clean slate, we retrofitted weird stuff like non-territorial federalism (gemeenschappen, communautés) whereas all other federations on this planet are territorial (gewesten, régions). This means that, unlike other federations, in Belgium we divide matters not only based on geography only, but also on language. This added complexity, in my view, doesn’t merit existence.

    In fact, I personally think we should move to purely territorial federalism with 4 regions who are each others equals in all matters, but that we should get there through a Constitutional Assemly where citizens and politicians rethink the basics, instead of tacking on some more amendments in yet another poorly conceived set of constitutional amendments in return for cash or whatever.

Leave a Reply