> Some topics on this subreddit have been known to attract problematic users
I really long for the day we can be accepting of the Welsh and they’re just used as political leverage.
>Their lawyers told the court a “fundamental right” was at stake over whether parents should have control over what their children were taught in school.
This is just a ridiculous right to assert that parents have. Presented like that it would also permit parents to veto basic subjects like maths or history. I hope that the journalists have misunderstood the nuance of the legal arguments here and what they’re actually presenting is some more complicated point about moral/spiritual education, not the insane idea that parents have the right to withdraw their kids from any subject.
This whole thing infuriates me. So much time wasted because of completely bollocks and dishonest misrepresentation of the curriculum.
3 comments
> Some topics on this subreddit have been known to attract problematic users
I really long for the day we can be accepting of the Welsh and they’re just used as political leverage.
>Their lawyers told the court a “fundamental right” was at stake over whether parents should have control over what their children were taught in school.
This is just a ridiculous right to assert that parents have. Presented like that it would also permit parents to veto basic subjects like maths or history. I hope that the journalists have misunderstood the nuance of the legal arguments here and what they’re actually presenting is some more complicated point about moral/spiritual education, not the insane idea that parents have the right to withdraw their kids from any subject.
This whole thing infuriates me. So much time wasted because of completely bollocks and dishonest misrepresentation of the curriculum.