In past Sweden invaded us so in fairness now shoud be our time.
Weird little question.
Yeah, im thinking this nato thing aint working out…we just need to figure the fuck out..if it’s for us or what to do with it. We all know in case of russian agression it will be the same players..regardless. bc nato wont want to escalate shit
Why is there a picture of Roof Baggins
Sweden needs Finland more than Finland needs Sweden. 😄
I prefer Nato over Sweden.
This post makes me prefer NATO over Sweden. Like a lot.
If karlsson is a nuclear weapon then yes.
I’m not sure what you mean, but as a finn I 100% would prefer nordic and baltic countries to stand together without NATO. That’s pretty utopistic, since most of our neighbors are either NATO or going for world conquest.
Sweden never had the balls to sign a mutual defense treaty, unfortunately.
A nordic defense league would be a badass alternate history.
Looks like we are getting both.
But seriously, Sweden alone is a not a strong enough ally and does not provide nuclear deterrence.
Hell no. Would prefer sweden to be on nato since sweden has no defense left.
I dont think 23600 active and 11200 reserve personnel make difference in battlefield when those forces cant defend even Sweden. Yes Sweden has many better equipments, but no enough users for those. Sweden has always hide behind Finland and i dont think Sweden could send any troops to support Finland. If Russia invades Finland its just like 39. Sweden condemn Russia and thats it, because they dont want war to their territory.
16 comments
What? Military alliance or another country?
In past Sweden invaded us so in fairness now shoud be our time.
Weird little question.
Yeah, im thinking this nato thing aint working out…we just need to figure the fuck out..if it’s for us or what to do with it. We all know in case of russian agression it will be the same players..regardless. bc nato wont want to escalate shit
Why is there a picture of Roof Baggins
Sweden needs Finland more than Finland needs Sweden. 😄
I prefer Nato over Sweden.
This post makes me prefer NATO over Sweden. Like a lot.
If karlsson is a nuclear weapon then yes.
I’m not sure what you mean, but as a finn I 100% would prefer nordic and baltic countries to stand together without NATO. That’s pretty utopistic, since most of our neighbors are either NATO or going for world conquest.
Sweden never had the balls to sign a mutual defense treaty, unfortunately.
A nordic defense league would be a badass alternate history.
Looks like we are getting both.
But seriously, Sweden alone is a not a strong enough ally and does not provide nuclear deterrence.
Hell no. Would prefer sweden to be on nato since sweden has no defense left.
I dont think 23600 active and 11200 reserve personnel make difference in battlefield when those forces cant defend even Sweden. Yes Sweden has many better equipments, but no enough users for those. Sweden has always hide behind Finland and i dont think Sweden could send any troops to support Finland. If Russia invades Finland its just like 39. Sweden condemn Russia and thats it, because they dont want war to their territory.
No. We need to be in Nato asap.
what? Are you kidding me, no????