Surveyor report done on the house I’m to but, this concern you?

25 comments
  1. Sounds like a standard CYA inserted paragraph, but is the power lines at the back of the site normal or part of some grid infrastructure?

  2. I will be contrary to what all others here are saying. No comment on the cancer thing, only on the market forces. Most people wouldn’t want to live very near big electrical pylons. This means most people won’t want to buy that house and that it’s value is lower than other comps. The price is probably the reason why you are interested in the first place. If you don’t care, and you never plan to sell, then you’re potentially getting a bit of a bargain, fair play. If you plan to sell, know that >50% of buyers would not be interested. It’s also standard CYa. Those documents are full of extreme boilerplate CYA.

    Source: I am in the game.

  3. Lol, no, it wouldn’t concern me in the slightest. Haven’t you ever heard of the inverse square law? You get more electromagnetic radiation from that phone in your hand than from that power line two hundred metres away, for fecks sake.

  4. Humans cannot detect electromagnetic radiation below infra red or beyond the visible light range. Whilst very high power radio frequency fields, typically very close to radio transmitters can have heating effect, the paragraph as written is complete bollocks and no surveyor should include it

  5. My main concern seeing that in the report would be that it’d start me questioning the competency of the surveyor as it’s complete bollox.

  6. Had the exact same wording in the report. I think you might be getting reports from the same lad I used. English guy with a name that begins with a G? If so, he’s excellent. Don’t think he believes EM waves to be harmful but he’s in the west cork area often, which is a bit alternative to say the least.

  7. That’s boiler plate language I’d imagine.

    The paragraph before highlights your Surveyor things it is total BS but some gobsh1tes might believe it so your potential buyer pool is lower when you come to sell.

    No more, no less.

  8. I wouldn’t buy near big pylons, and would be reluctant near smaller poles. Less worried about ‘cancer risk’, more worried about humming (because I can hear the hum) but also ongoing property values.

  9. To me it reads more as a warning that the cables might affect the planning of any future building you might want to put in the back garden (plus a “some people are afraid to live near Cables, so this might affect the value” speil). A potential problem for planning rather than living in the house.

    It looks similar to a warning about ‘party walls’.

    If you don’t plan on applying for permission to build anything substantial in the back garden, I wouldn’t worry about it.

  10. Surveyors are as dangerous as Estate Agents. Their only competency is talking absolute dribble and they bring nothing but total uncertainty to one of the biggest decisions of most people’s lives.

  11. As someone with a masters of electrical engineering, regulations provide an ample exclusion zone. I wouldn’t be all too concerned. I would say the value of the home would be undervalued as a result of overhead cables in the landscape but that’s it. It does read as a default text in this case

  12. Absolute nonsense. Definitely a CYA from some conspiracy theorist who also happens to do surveys.

    Not brave enough to try and give you a firm “don’t buy it” because that would land them in trouble but happy to engage in scaremongering with no evidence to back it up.

    Use a different surveyor.

Leave a Reply