Man jailed for rural burglary gets disability benefit for lactose intolerance, court told

31 comments
  1. I’ve got MS and had to jump (well, stumble) through hoops to get on disability but this cunt can’t drink a fuck Yop and he gets it.

  2. If he actually gets it for lactose intolerance then they need to look in to who signed off on that. They are equally to blame

  3. His mammy was probably on carers allowance because the bloated little fucker needed constant supervision so he wouldn’t be stuffing his fat fucking face with cheese strings, straight on to disability when he hit 18.

    Won’t be collecting it for a while now.

  4. Nothing symbolises the strong bond between a father and son like robbing an isolated house.

    Absolute vermin.

  5. I have MS, use a walking stick/mobility scooter, have an adapted car, was turned down for disability benefit…

  6. “Doctor, I can’t work, every time I eat ice-cream I violently shit myself. I can’t live, my asshole is in a constant state of fire from the never ending river of shit. I spend three hundred euro a week on new pants, I can hardly pay rent. Every pair of pants I have every worn has ended up being saturated in foul smelling, watery faeces. Please can you help me doctor”

  7. Look if a trace of dairy is putting him in a life-threatening scutters situation, sure, fair enough, but beyond that this seems like a misuse of public funds that could be better spent on more in-need individuals.

  8. More annoying than the lactose intolerance “disability” crap is that it took 5 years from the offence to the trial.

  9. Not saying it definitely didn’t happen, but:

    1. Most of the time claims like this about people abusing the benefits system collapse once they’re properly scrutinised, and

    2. The headline including the disclaimer “Court told” is a huge red flag that the reporters at the Times haven’t done even basic due diligence to see if it’s true.

    It’s the job of the prosecutors to make the defendant seem as sketchy as possible. It’s not supposed to be a journalist’s job to repeat what they say uncritically as though the newspaper is vouching for it.

Leave a Reply