Better sell them and lease them back fully renovated, right?
I don’t get why Petra De Sutter keeps saying that’s she’s aiming for 2 days of home office for civil servants. I would presume that many of their functions could be done just as well (and often better) working from home. For example, someone doing tax audits can do that working from home (or visiting companies) just as well as when he has to go to the office. I’m not saying don’t provide the option of coming into the office but why insist that people have to commute 3 times a week?
Just give those people the liberty to choose and you can probably sell half the buildings they currently own/rent. And then you can make sure that the buildings that you do keep are, well renovated and perfectly located.
How about less governments and less buildings all together
*Michel Van Den Brande has entered the chat*
Op, op, alles is op.
“nodig”
Amai, dure gebouwen.
If you read the article, note that we are paying 450 million -half a billion- YEARLY in rent for government buildings.
Verhofstadt I&II was the worst thing to ever happen to Belgium.
Can we first renovate the bridges over the highway and then government buildings? Their inspectors labeling the bridges structurally sounds doesn’t mean much to the people who get chunks of concrete on their car driving at 120 km/h.
9 comments
Better sell them and lease them back fully renovated, right?
I don’t get why Petra De Sutter keeps saying that’s she’s aiming for 2 days of home office for civil servants. I would presume that many of their functions could be done just as well (and often better) working from home. For example, someone doing tax audits can do that working from home (or visiting companies) just as well as when he has to go to the office. I’m not saying don’t provide the option of coming into the office but why insist that people have to commute 3 times a week?
Just give those people the liberty to choose and you can probably sell half the buildings they currently own/rent. And then you can make sure that the buildings that you do keep are, well renovated and perfectly located.
How about less governments and less buildings all together
*Michel Van Den Brande has entered the chat*
Op, op, alles is op.
“nodig”
Amai, dure gebouwen.
If you read the article, note that we are paying 450 million -half a billion- YEARLY in rent for government buildings.
Verhofstadt I&II was the worst thing to ever happen to Belgium.
Can we first renovate the bridges over the highway and then government buildings? Their inspectors labeling the bridges structurally sounds doesn’t mean much to the people who get chunks of concrete on their car driving at 120 km/h.