She’s a pedo. She should be in jail. Damn!!…Where is the gender equality when you need it.
Judged differently due to being a woman as usual then.
The judge should be ashamed of himself, she should be in jail.
Disgusting.. She should be in jail the same as any other Pedo.
Ah classic. The stats around women received lower sentences are insane.
Good luck having that conversation with anybody though.
lets be honest this is more common than we are led to believe but it is more hidden.
Just here to correct a bullshit article title, it should be:
“British pedator avoids jail after raping a minor”
I’m sick of articles using words like “sex”, “underage” and “mum” in an attempt to make this horrendous crime seem less serious than it really is.
You can’t (as an adult) have sex with a minor. It’s statutory rape and the media need to start saying it as it is.
Even language here is disgusting “Started sexual relationship” “where they would soon become intimate.” That is a weird way to say “she lured him in a house and sexually abused” also I hate mum being used as defense. When is man doing it is never “Dad of 3” but “sick pedo” and rightly so
Let me search for pedophile in article..and shocker – not found!
“British mom avoid jail after having sex with underage boy” actually this should say “pedophile avoids jail after raping underage boy”
Pedophile avoids jail because of gender in sexist ruling that is an utter disgrace.
I definitely agree she should be in jail, though I don’t think the attitude towards boys and men being sexually assaulted helps, like it’s an achievement, or he should be pleased, “go on lad” mentality and find it funny. I’ve seen this rhetoric when stories about female teachers grooming and assaulting male pupils comes up, the comment sections are baffling. It’s not taken seriously.
Far too lenient a sentence. Also why the reluctance of the article to refer to this paedophilia as what it is? She was *nearly double his age*.
I’ve worked with a lot of children, and until about age 20, they are so unbelievably vulnerable. It’s so apparent. They haven’t got a clue about anything, can be easily manipulated, and need to be protected. This is why there are safeguarding practices in every space they exist (not perfect yet).
How on earth can this judge state that the child is a rational actor and there were ‘genuine’ feelings. It is utterly shameful.
Flip the script on this and put a 28 year old man providing a 15 year old girl with alcohol and cannabis then inviting her over his. I doubt the judge would see their relationship as ‘loving’ and would rather perceive it as grooming and exploitation regardless of whether it was predatory or not.
This sort of stuff happens all the time. It’s not getting better.
Doesn’t even need to register as sex offender, madness. The uk desperately needs to change its sentencing as a whole, its not a deterrent for any crime unless its a highly publicised one.
Disgusting. She should be in jail, she’s a pedophile.
Vile cretin, manipulated a young unstable boy and got him high and drunk for sexual pleasures! Fucking sicko should be locked up!
At this point, news like this doesn’t even surprise me. How are we supposed to have any faith in the justice system when shit like this happens on a regular basis.
A vulnerable and suicidal 15 year old who she took drugs with and then had sex with… I’d have thought there was an aggravating factor or two there warranting some time in prison?
Wait. Despite being found guilty and receiving an (absurdly unjust and unfair) sentence, she doesn’t even have to sign onto the Sex Offenders Register?
What a fucking joke.
Wow! She’s clearly a pedophile, and she hasn’t gone to jail… what in the fuck is this “justice system” about. 🤦♂️
British paedophile mother avoids jail after grooming and raping child.
This should be the title.
Title doesn’t say rape btw because legally that would be libel- rape is defined in British law as by penetration with a penis. Which is fucked. Get mad at the government, not headline writers
This makes me feel so sad for that young boy. He told the police he felt exploited by the relationship and it had caused him to feel suicidal, and the judge STILL SAID IT WAS A LOVING RELATIONSHIP??
That is EXACTLY how grooming works – I am a victim of grooming myself and felt the same way. In love with my abuser, yet my life was falling apart and I wanted to die. And once it was over and the spell wore off, I was left with feelings of disgust, violation and shame that will last a lifetime.
Can’t imagine what he’s going through as a result of this. Being told by a JUDGE that the “relationship was mutually loving” is my biggest fear. I hope somewhere he’s reading and sees the outrage and feels some comfort. The world absolutely needs to change.
EDIT: Also the “oh they had a difficult childhood too!” excuse can FUCK OFF. There is no excuse for child abuse. Ever.
Literally just a pedophile, how the fuck did she avoid prison?
Having read the article… she knew it was bad, but he was into it, and his mum approved. He probably only changed how he felt when they broke up.
“Judge Rupert Lowe branded Lines’ actions “serious sexual offences”, but was convinced she was not predatorial and became attracted to the boy as a “one-off” incident.”
Ah right ok, so pedophilia is OK as long as it’s a one-off… Gotcha
im not surprised…
law doest care about sex predators. just look at all the scandals involving rapists in the Metropolitan Police.
Rape. Woman paedophile rapes child. There you go. Fixed it.
Even the article reads like it’s in the male gaze:
“She gave him weed, booze AND sex – lucky lad!”
The legal definition needs changing ASAP, without it, it gives reporters the room to reframe what it ACTUALLY is.
Grew up in care system…..basically she was abused in care system.
Takes MDMA dugs alcohol and is ‘vulnerable’ so she has right to fk kids……. basically became an abuser
all of op’s post history is on men’s rights or antifeminist subs.
the source is an unknown rag of a paper – the singapore version?
can we please be a bit more judicious with the upvoting and the encouraging? perhaps also the modding.
Can we stop letting nonces go free? So what if she’s got a fanny – she shagged a kid!
34 comments
She’s a pedo. She should be in jail. Damn!!…Where is the gender equality when you need it.
Judged differently due to being a woman as usual then.
The judge should be ashamed of himself, she should be in jail.
Disgusting.. She should be in jail the same as any other Pedo.
Ah classic. The stats around women received lower sentences are insane.
Good luck having that conversation with anybody though.
lets be honest this is more common than we are led to believe but it is more hidden.
Just here to correct a bullshit article title, it should be:
“British pedator avoids jail after raping a minor”
I’m sick of articles using words like “sex”, “underage” and “mum” in an attempt to make this horrendous crime seem less serious than it really is.
You can’t (as an adult) have sex with a minor. It’s statutory rape and the media need to start saying it as it is.
Even language here is disgusting “Started sexual relationship” “where they would soon become intimate.” That is a weird way to say “she lured him in a house and sexually abused” also I hate mum being used as defense. When is man doing it is never “Dad of 3” but “sick pedo” and rightly so
Let me search for pedophile in article..and shocker – not found!
“British mom avoid jail after having sex with underage boy” actually this should say “pedophile avoids jail after raping underage boy”
Pedophile avoids jail because of gender in sexist ruling that is an utter disgrace.
I definitely agree she should be in jail, though I don’t think the attitude towards boys and men being sexually assaulted helps, like it’s an achievement, or he should be pleased, “go on lad” mentality and find it funny. I’ve seen this rhetoric when stories about female teachers grooming and assaulting male pupils comes up, the comment sections are baffling. It’s not taken seriously.
Far too lenient a sentence. Also why the reluctance of the article to refer to this paedophilia as what it is? She was *nearly double his age*.
I’ve worked with a lot of children, and until about age 20, they are so unbelievably vulnerable. It’s so apparent. They haven’t got a clue about anything, can be easily manipulated, and need to be protected. This is why there are safeguarding practices in every space they exist (not perfect yet).
How on earth can this judge state that the child is a rational actor and there were ‘genuine’ feelings. It is utterly shameful.
Flip the script on this and put a 28 year old man providing a 15 year old girl with alcohol and cannabis then inviting her over his. I doubt the judge would see their relationship as ‘loving’ and would rather perceive it as grooming and exploitation regardless of whether it was predatory or not.
This sort of stuff happens all the time. It’s not getting better.
Doesn’t even need to register as sex offender, madness. The uk desperately needs to change its sentencing as a whole, its not a deterrent for any crime unless its a highly publicised one.
Disgusting. She should be in jail, she’s a pedophile.
Vile cretin, manipulated a young unstable boy and got him high and drunk for sexual pleasures! Fucking sicko should be locked up!
At this point, news like this doesn’t even surprise me. How are we supposed to have any faith in the justice system when shit like this happens on a regular basis.
A vulnerable and suicidal 15 year old who she took drugs with and then had sex with… I’d have thought there was an aggravating factor or two there warranting some time in prison?
Wait. Despite being found guilty and receiving an (absurdly unjust and unfair) sentence, she doesn’t even have to sign onto the Sex Offenders Register?
What a fucking joke.
Wow! She’s clearly a pedophile, and she hasn’t gone to jail… what in the fuck is this “justice system” about. 🤦♂️
British paedophile mother avoids jail after grooming and raping child.
This should be the title.
Title doesn’t say rape btw because legally that would be libel- rape is defined in British law as by penetration with a penis. Which is fucked. Get mad at the government, not headline writers
This makes me feel so sad for that young boy. He told the police he felt exploited by the relationship and it had caused him to feel suicidal, and the judge STILL SAID IT WAS A LOVING RELATIONSHIP??
That is EXACTLY how grooming works – I am a victim of grooming myself and felt the same way. In love with my abuser, yet my life was falling apart and I wanted to die. And once it was over and the spell wore off, I was left with feelings of disgust, violation and shame that will last a lifetime.
Can’t imagine what he’s going through as a result of this. Being told by a JUDGE that the “relationship was mutually loving” is my biggest fear. I hope somewhere he’s reading and sees the outrage and feels some comfort. The world absolutely needs to change.
EDIT: Also the “oh they had a difficult childhood too!” excuse can FUCK OFF. There is no excuse for child abuse. Ever.
Literally just a pedophile, how the fuck did she avoid prison?
Having read the article… she knew it was bad, but he was into it, and his mum approved. He probably only changed how he felt when they broke up.
“Judge Rupert Lowe branded Lines’ actions “serious sexual offences”, but was convinced she was not predatorial and became attracted to the boy as a “one-off” incident.”
Ah right ok, so pedophilia is OK as long as it’s a one-off… Gotcha
im not surprised…
law doest care about sex predators. just look at all the scandals involving rapists in the Metropolitan Police.
Rape. Woman paedophile rapes child. There you go. Fixed it.
Even the article reads like it’s in the male gaze:
“She gave him weed, booze AND sex – lucky lad!”
The legal definition needs changing ASAP, without it, it gives reporters the room to reframe what it ACTUALLY is.
Grew up in care system…..basically she was abused in care system.
Takes MDMA dugs alcohol and is ‘vulnerable’ so she has right to fk kids……. basically became an abuser
all of op’s post history is on men’s rights or antifeminist subs.
the source is an unknown rag of a paper – the singapore version?
can we please be a bit more judicious with the upvoting and the encouraging? perhaps also the modding.
Can we stop letting nonces go free? So what if she’s got a fanny – she shagged a kid!