As much as I don’t like Hancock, politicians should be able to move freely. Idiots who assault or harass them force them to not attend moots, get private cars everywhere, and put barriers up between them and the public they’re meant to be engaged with.
Anything Hancock deserves a downvote do T give him attention. he probably paid the guy to harrass him for the publicity
Don’t care what your politics are, this is unacceptable. Who the hell would want to be a politician with all the shit they have to put up with
Good.
The law doesnt stop applying to people you don’t like…
Just curious as to what’s the number of deaths before people would condone violence? This man forced the elderly back into care homes at a time where he knew it would lead to thousands of deaths of a particularly vulnerable part of society.
I’m sure we’d have all advocated chinning everyone’s favorite Austrian dictator around 1945, but that’s too easy, and he did start a world war.
More a few would have loved to have decked Bin Laden and he “only” killed 3000.
Shipman killed about 250, again mostly elderly, we all honestly wouldn’t kick him in the balls if you’d have been given the chance?
“But Hancock didn’t do it directly! It’s different” I refer you back to the Austrian fella.
“You’re advocating violence, that’s against the sub rules” no I’m not, please go about your law abiding business as usual, I’m asking a question which, at present, is entirely legal.
5 comments
Good.
As much as I don’t like Hancock, politicians should be able to move freely. Idiots who assault or harass them force them to not attend moots, get private cars everywhere, and put barriers up between them and the public they’re meant to be engaged with.
Anything Hancock deserves a downvote do T give him attention. he probably paid the guy to harrass him for the publicity
Don’t care what your politics are, this is unacceptable. Who the hell would want to be a politician with all the shit they have to put up with
Good.
The law doesnt stop applying to people you don’t like…
Just curious as to what’s the number of deaths before people would condone violence? This man forced the elderly back into care homes at a time where he knew it would lead to thousands of deaths of a particularly vulnerable part of society.
I’m sure we’d have all advocated chinning everyone’s favorite Austrian dictator around 1945, but that’s too easy, and he did start a world war.
More a few would have loved to have decked Bin Laden and he “only” killed 3000.
Shipman killed about 250, again mostly elderly, we all honestly wouldn’t kick him in the balls if you’d have been given the chance?
“But Hancock didn’t do it directly! It’s different” I refer you back to the Austrian fella.
“You’re advocating violence, that’s against the sub rules” no I’m not, please go about your law abiding business as usual, I’m asking a question which, at present, is entirely legal.