Honestly the unionists are mental they literally said we want Bozo and the deal. Everyone said you will stay in the custom union and therefore be surrendering the one thing you said was a red line with Theresa May deal. They said we don’t care we will have it. They are now in court not arguing we were deceived or we didn’t know they are literally saying we want this Law change because we are sovereign. The judge that has to explain that by the fundamental right of being sovereign is that the sovereign UK government agreed this change and you are no longer in a position to force any change but ironical when Theresa May was in power you had a cooperation deal and could have supported a deal and remained tied to a uk wide custom deal.
So the DUP and other hardliners believe that the Protocol damages the Union, and now the Supreme Court of said Union says otherwise. How does this be interpreted by anti-protocol unionists? Will they now see that the Union they love so much is in reality a one sided/unrequited love? That NI is literally not important to the UK government at all? That wasting so much time and effort to protect this Union is just that, a waste? Or will they continue to fight it and blame SF somehow? Resulting in yet more useless deadlock? Ugh, this place is a joke.
that really doesn’t mean much looking at some of the laws that have come out of Westminster recently
Aw, no hard border and a return to apartheid statelet for the colonists in north east Ireland. Oh dear, never mind.
OK, comparing the situation to the ECHR, how about Northern Ireland would leave some kind of agreement so this ruling doesn’t apply to them?
…
I see myself out…
Brought to you by the DUP who *argued that [the NIP] had breached the principle of consent at the core of the 1998 Belfast Good Friday agreement.* – guess which bunch of knuckle dragging fundamentalists voted *against* the 1998 GFA? Cakeism is alive and well in the Unionist Politicians’ little minds.
6 comments
Honestly the unionists are mental they literally said we want Bozo and the deal. Everyone said you will stay in the custom union and therefore be surrendering the one thing you said was a red line with Theresa May deal. They said we don’t care we will have it. They are now in court not arguing we were deceived or we didn’t know they are literally saying we want this Law change because we are sovereign. The judge that has to explain that by the fundamental right of being sovereign is that the sovereign UK government agreed this change and you are no longer in a position to force any change but ironical when Theresa May was in power you had a cooperation deal and could have supported a deal and remained tied to a uk wide custom deal.
So the DUP and other hardliners believe that the Protocol damages the Union, and now the Supreme Court of said Union says otherwise. How does this be interpreted by anti-protocol unionists? Will they now see that the Union they love so much is in reality a one sided/unrequited love? That NI is literally not important to the UK government at all? That wasting so much time and effort to protect this Union is just that, a waste? Or will they continue to fight it and blame SF somehow? Resulting in yet more useless deadlock? Ugh, this place is a joke.
that really doesn’t mean much looking at some of the laws that have come out of Westminster recently
Aw, no hard border and a return to apartheid statelet for the colonists in north east Ireland. Oh dear, never mind.
OK, comparing the situation to the ECHR, how about Northern Ireland would leave some kind of agreement so this ruling doesn’t apply to them?
…
I see myself out…
Brought to you by the DUP who *argued that [the NIP] had breached the principle of consent at the core of the 1998 Belfast Good Friday agreement.* – guess which bunch of knuckle dragging fundamentalists voted *against* the 1998 GFA? Cakeism is alive and well in the Unionist Politicians’ little minds.
I guess this means they fully support it now.