Proposals to increase sentences for assaults on gardaí

33 comments
  1. Why not just enforce convictions properly?

    Without even hazarding a look at the statute book, if memory serves assaulting a peace officer or otherwise interfering with a peace officer in the execution of their duties already has a sentence of a few years at the max?

  2. What do you mean proposal. I don’t care what people think of them. Attacking a member of the Gardai should just be a minimum sentence of 30 days handcuffed to Enoch Burke.

  3. I go assaulted by 2 guys, broken nose, tooth, eyesocket, upper jaw, lost 3200 in wages + medical expenses, probably about 5k outta pocket,

    One was just off suspended sentence for 2 previous assaults,

    They have to may me 4k compensation between them and suspended sentence again, fucking joke I’m still out a grand through no fault of my own. Systems a joke they should do a year in jail each minimum

  4. Raising the maximum sentence means absolutely nothing ! Maximum sentencing is NEVER applied in Ireland.

    Minimum custodial sentences however might make some people think twice and if it doesn’t at least it’ll get them off the streets for awhile if they do assault emergency service personnel.

    Another half measure from the government. Their specialty.

  5. Wasn’t this the case beforehand? But then it created an impression that assaults on non garda civilians was a lesser crime when in reality it should be equal.

  6. There’s already a 7 year sentence for assaulting members of an Garda Síochána, Prison officer, Members of the fire brigade, Ambulance personnel or Members of the Defence Forces.

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard of somebody getting 7 years for doing that.

  7. No maximum sentences or minimum sentencing term. One fixed and non negotiable sentence for each crime. If you are convicted of crime A you do X time, no debate, no parole, no suspension of sentence, no matter who you are. The grey are opens the system up to abuse, nepotism, the power of daddy’s money, and potential nullification from the inside by those who don’t believe in the system(Nolan for a start). You can sub divided crimes by grade, like the US does with murder, in order to create a slightly more nuanced system, while keeping it fundamentally black and white. I would also be in favour of 3 strikes = life for serious violent crimes. At some point people are irredeemable

  8. Would definitely support some sort of case by case basis for this law change, perhaps allowing a jury or judge to take into account the context of how the assault offence occurred when sentencing?

  9. So sentences for Garda who commit crimes should also be increased. If assault against Garda is more serious than against a non Garda, than Garda breaking the law should be considered more serious than non Garda doing.

  10. Different US states went through the mandatory minimum phase. California instituted the famous “three strikes.”

    Isn’t the problem that the judges should be removed from the penalty process ? The fair way would be different. The jury of peers should set the sentence. The magistrate should be an arbiter of the law.

Leave a Reply