Yes. Unquestionably it’s that chicken and stuffing sandwich, fruit pot and sprite to blame.
Presumably folk will find that a Big Mac is now comparatively priced. This can only go well.
(I appreciate I talks about 2 for 1 deals too)
I don’t think having a government which passes laws which restrict and regulate minute details about how businesses operate or how people live is a good idea.
If you want to regulate business, it would be better to close tax loopholes. (Though I know The Welsh government can’t)
> But the Welsh Retail Consortium has written to ministers to warn them this could damage food producers, reduce choice and increase food prices.
Definitely not what anyone needs right now. If anything, the government should be implementing policies to reduce food prices and increase choice.
Healthy food subsidies and healthier food choices would help tackle obesity.
Tesco meal deal:
Chicken, bacon, and stuffing sandwich: 483 cals
Can of coke: 105 calories
Mars bar: 228 calories
That’s 1/3rd of a man’s recommended intake. I don’t think it’s meal deals causing obesity. Lower calorie options are available in meal deals too.
Seems like a stupid policy that will increase the cost of food for negligible health benefits.
Can’t say I’m surprised that people in government are stupid enough to support this
They have no idea
Can we not make food more expensive in a cost of living crisis? Do we really have to say it?
This is the same Welsh Labour Government that forced supermarkets to block access to aisles containing “non essential items” during the pandemic – without specifying what they determine to be essential and non essential. This led to clothes, basic cooking utensils and even baby food being inaccessible at supermarkets.
This Welsh Labour Government is a disaster for Wales.
In the grand scheme of things, a meal deal is surely a healthier alternative to things like Greggs or McDonalds? Surely making a meal deal more expensive than less healthy options is counterproductive as well. Absolute silliness
Meanwhile, the local McDonalds swarming with Uber Eats and Just Eats drivers waiting to pick up 3 orders each for delivery… O.o
…And the local gym charging £49 a month no-cancel for 12 month contracts 🤡
The classic government plan of making cheap food more expensive, to starve people into health? It’s not worked so far, but who knows maybe just more price rises are needed?
[removed]
It’s pathetic stuff but this is just authoritarian.
If someone wants to eat a slightly too large sandwich every day then let them.
If you want people to be less fat, maybe make it easier to live a healthy life style. Is there anywhere to exercise in the local area for example.
Its not the meal deal that’s the issue. Banning them will make naff all difference. Its peoples ongoing lifestyle choices and the information they have to help them make those choices.
I weightlift, compete in competitions, do a lot of running, do a lot of meal prep. But if im travelling for work that meal deal from M&S at the train station is a life saver both in terms of convenience and money. And a bottle of Iron Bru on the train home is a nice change for me. Or if iv gone to a gig and had a few good beers, a MacD’s or Burger King on the way home is no issue. Its all in the context of my normal lifestyle.
What we should be doing is teaching and arming people with the knowledge and tools to live healthier lifestyles overall.
We talk about privilege at times. I was *privileged* to have a set of parents who taught me how to cook and I have been taught via others how to expand that out to cooking at scale, prepping meals and freezing them, being able to have a freezer large enough to make that really viable.
We need to look at peoples relationship with food, ability to cook and encourage people to exercise more. Just banning meal deals and thinking that it will make and impact is very short sighted.
Sick of government acting as if overeating can be solved by higher prices and not by supporting and educating on how to balance calories.
Total low effort nonsense which will have no effect on the problem
I hate this trend of headlines giving half the story (inevitably the clickbait half)… meal deals are one component of the proposal and yeah I think that’s not going to do a great deal, but targeting multi-buy offers seems reasonable – they just tend to encourage you to buy more than you’d already want, which isn’t great when your willpower is caving anyway ><
How about spending more on cycling infrastructure to get people out of their cars for short journeys? That not only improves the nations health, it helps meat green targets by reducing pollution. win win.
policymakers try to make intelligent decisions challenge (impossible)
It’s more about our attitude to food than the food itself. People go for what is convenient because they are rushed for time and grab what is easy to eat in the minutes. If people are expected to eat better, they need the time to make healthier meals and the time to really think about what they are eating. When you are rushed, picking up a meal deal takes a lot of thought out of the equation. Calmer people make better food choices, society needs to slow down to help reduce obesity.
Wales seems pretty keen on the old ban hammer, no new roads, no meal deals. We’ve seen how blanket bans work, its never good in the long run
I am biased though as a road designer who rather enjoys a meal deal, but I do genuinely this kind of governance is bad for the country
Alternative headline: Wales may make it even harder for people on lower incomes
The best way to tackle obesity is communism (or do what the Japanese did and tax employers for hiring overweight people)
This pisses me off. I’m not obese or even overweight but by Jesus am I fuckin poor!!!!
My partner and I have a meal deal every Thursday after our run. It’s the only run we get together and it’s a nice little treat after.
Is anyone actually getting obese on meal deals or are they getting obese due to underlying trauma, lifestyle and financial stressors and the piles of sugar and salt that’s added into everything we eat, even “healthy” foods?
Stop banning shit and removing people’s freedom of choice.
I’m healthy and a normal weight for my age and gender.
Maybe you should spend time and effort on more education and research on how to tackle obesity itself. No one is getting fat off the back of a Boot’s meal deal.
Why not just ban all marketing of junk food to children? Do we really need children’s cartoon characters on the wrapping of bubble gum and chocolate bars?
The UK started and caused its obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemic in 1984 with the COMA report which changed our dietary guidelines. Our food was changed to low fat (manufactures started taking some fat out of normal products) , and we were told to go low fat. It’s not a calorie issue. Go watch loads of videos of the 70s and 80s on YouTube, it is spot the obese person, as they are not that common. We use to consume Mars bars or flakes that we’re double the size of the ones now yet the majority were able to maintain a normal body composition and a BMI under 25, and somebody being obese was rare.
Processed food is the problem, its making up too much of what we consume, what was once a treat is now our main staple it has hijacked our satiety signalling, you know like Pringles, once you pop you cannot stop. Peoples bodies are signalling low fuel constantly now, hence people are snacking on top of eating meals. Diets high in processed carbs which is what the majority are eating now is hormonal dis-regulating us.
Eat 2 or 3 meals a day of real unprocessed food ie eggs, butter, steak, vegetables, chicken, fish, cheese, milk, berries with no snacking and the problem will go away. Once you are normal weight you can likely get away with the occasional Snickers Bar or Starbucks.
I find it insane the queues at the drive-thru’s for McDonalds and Starbucks plus amount of just eat and deliveroo sending out junk to peoples home with next to no nutritional value.
I wonder how many towns and villages in Wales don’t have access to a good gym.
One of the reasons people are fat is because their lives are essentially entirely sedentary.
These decisions only effect one group of people, the poor. In a time of rapidly climbing inflation we shouldnt be cutting off avenues to cheaper food even if it is unhealthy.
Edit: cool, i get it “make stuff at home” is all well and good if you have the time and energy. Sounds like none of you are living in the fucking present. But if this doesnt reach you on your soap boxes maybe this will: by getting rid of meal deals, your cutting off yet another source of the very little pleasure some poor people get. Most cant afford take out anymore, or any form of treat that doesnt make a meal. I work with mutual aid groups and am poor myself. I dont get to buy crisps or chocolate, i need to pay my bills and buy the bare basics for nutrition. So sorry if i splurge on a meal deal every now and then to have atleast a little break in the chicken and rice or pasta with a few veg i get once a day cause gas prices are extortionate and my rents more than half my fucking income even outside of the big cities. Have a fucking heart.
WHAT YOU PUT INTO YOUR BODY IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.
Excellent idea.
“You can have this healthy sandwich for cheap as long as buy some junk food along with it.”
Although they will probably just package it together in a bag and sell it as one product.
This is definitely not good.
Educate people, don’t remove free will
Slippery slope…
This would be an unbelievably bad idea at the best of times, but during a cost of living crisis where we’re all suffering it’s catastrophically cloth-eared and stupid.
A chicken and caesar wrap with a bag of crisps and a lilt isn’t why I’m fat.
I’m fat because I’m a literal addict whose crutch happens to be sugar and carbs, both of which are constantly advertised and ludicrously easy to get hold of.
Plus, you know, a society that right now is so depressing to be part of that unhealthy food is one of the few sources of pleasure I have right now.
Great idea. Let’s tackle obesity by making food more pricey for poorer people…
This is a problem, I’m on Universal Credit and I can see this act as a way of restricting access to people to food. The end result of that is starving people. And as I see it, potentially of those starving people, some might even die, or become malnourished.
People forget some people still live without refrigeration or cooking facilities. People living in bedsits or even immigrants living in hotels; for them a meal deal might be a fairly sound budgeting choice. About £3.50. And also we must factor in ability to cook.
From my own experience, a daily meal budget is only perhaps £5 on Universal Credit post-bills, actually slightly less. So a meal deal actually makes sense if that’s your only meal (not that I’m condoning that as a diet it’s woefully inadequate).
If the government wishes to decide on food policy, they should provide a calorifically and nutritional daily meal that anyone suffering in food poverty can access as an alternative as well as their policy at will. Food should be a universal basic human right. Leaving it to charity in a time when people will give less because of the economic constrictions is tantamount to murder because it’s so obvious what can happen. I’d rather have fat people than dead people.
The real question when considered democratically is when people are at the ballet box, how many poverty-stricken people are you willing to kill or let die. And in my opinion this might increase that number.
The real answer is to subsidize staples which are calorifically and nutritionally sensible or even as I think provide them free. Why is the fourth largest economy unable to provide food for everyone?
People need to take responsibility for their own health. Its ridiculous to ban unhealthy food
I’m sure if they looked at the eating habits of the obese people they were concerned with, they’d find some more obvious smoking guns than a chicken caesar wrap. Chip shops, 2litre bottles of coke, over-eating stuff that probably would have been fine in lower levels.
A sandwich, bottle of drink and a packet of crisps isn’t exactly a massive lunch.
Of course, instead fo actually educating people when it comes to nutrition, let’s just control every little thing, including meal deals. It’s getting to a point where it’s riddicolous.
If you’re going to mandate anything, at least make it a requirement for a meal deal to be healthy. Don’t allow crisps or chocolate bar (was absolutely gobsmacked when I moved to the UK and realised it’s a thing) and have a healthier option with a fruit which would be cheaper as opposed to more expensive. Instead of soda, have cheaper option with water. The meal deal in itself isn’t inherently bad, it’s how they’re made and advertised.
​
Actually having a cheaper option of a meal deal with water, sandwich and an apple instead of removing the meal deal option all together would be much more beneficial long term.
​
and if a person going to KFC is going to get a meal deal, they’re still going to get unhealthy amount. Instead of getting a drink there, they may just pop into a corner shop to get 2l bottle of soda which is cheaper and have even more sugar that a cup half filled with ice. Someone eating consistently at fast foods is not going to change their habits because meal deals are gone, they’re simply going to find a cheaper alternative.
This just targets low income people already struggling to eat, why not just provide everyone with fruit and veg if they are so insistent on health? Surely at a time when wages are stagnant, inflation is at ATH and virtually every source of food has risen by at least 10-15% they should be focusing on those issues instead of obesity? I don’t see the sense in this at all.
I can’t lie I actually don’t give a fuck if people want to eat shit, the tackling of obesity starts with getting to the root cause and working on those issues (I was obese, had a binge eating disorder, lost 5 stone- it’s not that they’re all just thick and lazy) not just banning things and treating the public like children.
I don’t even buy meal deals and this pisses me off.
All across Wales the occupants of trains starve to death as the only subsistence suitable for train travel is vanquished
So utterly stupid.. punishing the every day person because of a growing minorities inability to control their diet.. food isn’t the issue, nor is food pricing. It’s education.
Wouldn’t it just make more sense at this point to tax the over weight more.. punish those who it’s aimed at.
World has gone mad with all its acceptance.. plus size this and that.. next we will blame “sexy kids” for the existence of pedos..
Oh look, it’s the Nanny State looking to squeeze the working class even tighter.
the absolute most fatting meal deal you can get is like..what..600 calories? most softdrinks are already sugar free.
​
people will just go to greggs or maccys instead which is worse
​
also they are the saviour of physically demanding jobs
Always putting other prices up, never reducing the price of healthier alternatives. Just making it harder to be poor.
“I say Rupert. How can we make life more expensive for the peasants?”
“How about banning meals deals Tarquin?
“HAW HAW!” “SPOT ON OLD BOY!”
Oh yay banning deals on food in a time of crisis. Heres some advice to stop people actually being obese “have some fucking self control fatty!”
Why should I be punished because other people are addicts?
Ooo so that’s what they are doing with this cost of living issue in the uk. It’s to help remove meal deals from the shelves…make it more expensive to eat…nice one lads
49 comments
Yes. Unquestionably it’s that chicken and stuffing sandwich, fruit pot and sprite to blame.
Presumably folk will find that a Big Mac is now comparatively priced. This can only go well.
(I appreciate I talks about 2 for 1 deals too)
I don’t think having a government which passes laws which restrict and regulate minute details about how businesses operate or how people live is a good idea.
If you want to regulate business, it would be better to close tax loopholes. (Though I know The Welsh government can’t)
> But the Welsh Retail Consortium has written to ministers to warn them this could damage food producers, reduce choice and increase food prices.
Definitely not what anyone needs right now. If anything, the government should be implementing policies to reduce food prices and increase choice.
Healthy food subsidies and healthier food choices would help tackle obesity.
Tesco meal deal:
Chicken, bacon, and stuffing sandwich: 483 cals
Can of coke: 105 calories
Mars bar: 228 calories
That’s 1/3rd of a man’s recommended intake. I don’t think it’s meal deals causing obesity. Lower calorie options are available in meal deals too.
Seems like a stupid policy that will increase the cost of food for negligible health benefits.
Can’t say I’m surprised that people in government are stupid enough to support this
They have no idea
Can we not make food more expensive in a cost of living crisis? Do we really have to say it?
This is the same Welsh Labour Government that forced supermarkets to block access to aisles containing “non essential items” during the pandemic – without specifying what they determine to be essential and non essential. This led to clothes, basic cooking utensils and even baby food being inaccessible at supermarkets.
This Welsh Labour Government is a disaster for Wales.
In the grand scheme of things, a meal deal is surely a healthier alternative to things like Greggs or McDonalds? Surely making a meal deal more expensive than less healthy options is counterproductive as well. Absolute silliness
Meanwhile, the local McDonalds swarming with Uber Eats and Just Eats drivers waiting to pick up 3 orders each for delivery… O.o
…And the local gym charging £49 a month no-cancel for 12 month contracts 🤡
The classic government plan of making cheap food more expensive, to starve people into health? It’s not worked so far, but who knows maybe just more price rises are needed?
[removed]
It’s pathetic stuff but this is just authoritarian.
If someone wants to eat a slightly too large sandwich every day then let them.
If you want people to be less fat, maybe make it easier to live a healthy life style. Is there anywhere to exercise in the local area for example.
Its not the meal deal that’s the issue. Banning them will make naff all difference. Its peoples ongoing lifestyle choices and the information they have to help them make those choices.
I weightlift, compete in competitions, do a lot of running, do a lot of meal prep. But if im travelling for work that meal deal from M&S at the train station is a life saver both in terms of convenience and money. And a bottle of Iron Bru on the train home is a nice change for me. Or if iv gone to a gig and had a few good beers, a MacD’s or Burger King on the way home is no issue. Its all in the context of my normal lifestyle.
What we should be doing is teaching and arming people with the knowledge and tools to live healthier lifestyles overall.
We talk about privilege at times. I was *privileged* to have a set of parents who taught me how to cook and I have been taught via others how to expand that out to cooking at scale, prepping meals and freezing them, being able to have a freezer large enough to make that really viable.
We need to look at peoples relationship with food, ability to cook and encourage people to exercise more. Just banning meal deals and thinking that it will make and impact is very short sighted.
Sick of government acting as if overeating can be solved by higher prices and not by supporting and educating on how to balance calories.
Total low effort nonsense which will have no effect on the problem
I hate this trend of headlines giving half the story (inevitably the clickbait half)… meal deals are one component of the proposal and yeah I think that’s not going to do a great deal, but targeting multi-buy offers seems reasonable – they just tend to encourage you to buy more than you’d already want, which isn’t great when your willpower is caving anyway ><
How about spending more on cycling infrastructure to get people out of their cars for short journeys? That not only improves the nations health, it helps meat green targets by reducing pollution. win win.
policymakers try to make intelligent decisions challenge (impossible)
It’s more about our attitude to food than the food itself. People go for what is convenient because they are rushed for time and grab what is easy to eat in the minutes. If people are expected to eat better, they need the time to make healthier meals and the time to really think about what they are eating. When you are rushed, picking up a meal deal takes a lot of thought out of the equation. Calmer people make better food choices, society needs to slow down to help reduce obesity.
Wales seems pretty keen on the old ban hammer, no new roads, no meal deals. We’ve seen how blanket bans work, its never good in the long run
I am biased though as a road designer who rather enjoys a meal deal, but I do genuinely this kind of governance is bad for the country
Alternative headline: Wales may make it even harder for people on lower incomes
The best way to tackle obesity is communism (or do what the Japanese did and tax employers for hiring overweight people)
This pisses me off. I’m not obese or even overweight but by Jesus am I fuckin poor!!!!
My partner and I have a meal deal every Thursday after our run. It’s the only run we get together and it’s a nice little treat after.
Is anyone actually getting obese on meal deals or are they getting obese due to underlying trauma, lifestyle and financial stressors and the piles of sugar and salt that’s added into everything we eat, even “healthy” foods?
Stop banning shit and removing people’s freedom of choice.
I’m healthy and a normal weight for my age and gender.
Maybe you should spend time and effort on more education and research on how to tackle obesity itself. No one is getting fat off the back of a Boot’s meal deal.
Why not just ban all marketing of junk food to children? Do we really need children’s cartoon characters on the wrapping of bubble gum and chocolate bars?
The UK started and caused its obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemic in 1984 with the COMA report which changed our dietary guidelines. Our food was changed to low fat (manufactures started taking some fat out of normal products) , and we were told to go low fat. It’s not a calorie issue. Go watch loads of videos of the 70s and 80s on YouTube, it is spot the obese person, as they are not that common. We use to consume Mars bars or flakes that we’re double the size of the ones now yet the majority were able to maintain a normal body composition and a BMI under 25, and somebody being obese was rare.
Processed food is the problem, its making up too much of what we consume, what was once a treat is now our main staple it has hijacked our satiety signalling, you know like Pringles, once you pop you cannot stop. Peoples bodies are signalling low fuel constantly now, hence people are snacking on top of eating meals. Diets high in processed carbs which is what the majority are eating now is hormonal dis-regulating us.
Eat 2 or 3 meals a day of real unprocessed food ie eggs, butter, steak, vegetables, chicken, fish, cheese, milk, berries with no snacking and the problem will go away. Once you are normal weight you can likely get away with the occasional Snickers Bar or Starbucks.
I find it insane the queues at the drive-thru’s for McDonalds and Starbucks plus amount of just eat and deliveroo sending out junk to peoples home with next to no nutritional value.
I wonder how many towns and villages in Wales don’t have access to a good gym.
One of the reasons people are fat is because their lives are essentially entirely sedentary.
These decisions only effect one group of people, the poor. In a time of rapidly climbing inflation we shouldnt be cutting off avenues to cheaper food even if it is unhealthy.
Edit: cool, i get it “make stuff at home” is all well and good if you have the time and energy. Sounds like none of you are living in the fucking present. But if this doesnt reach you on your soap boxes maybe this will: by getting rid of meal deals, your cutting off yet another source of the very little pleasure some poor people get. Most cant afford take out anymore, or any form of treat that doesnt make a meal. I work with mutual aid groups and am poor myself. I dont get to buy crisps or chocolate, i need to pay my bills and buy the bare basics for nutrition. So sorry if i splurge on a meal deal every now and then to have atleast a little break in the chicken and rice or pasta with a few veg i get once a day cause gas prices are extortionate and my rents more than half my fucking income even outside of the big cities. Have a fucking heart.
WHAT YOU PUT INTO YOUR BODY IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.
Excellent idea.
“You can have this healthy sandwich for cheap as long as buy some junk food along with it.”
Although they will probably just package it together in a bag and sell it as one product.
This is definitely not good.
Educate people, don’t remove free will
Slippery slope…
This would be an unbelievably bad idea at the best of times, but during a cost of living crisis where we’re all suffering it’s catastrophically cloth-eared and stupid.
A chicken and caesar wrap with a bag of crisps and a lilt isn’t why I’m fat.
I’m fat because I’m a literal addict whose crutch happens to be sugar and carbs, both of which are constantly advertised and ludicrously easy to get hold of.
Plus, you know, a society that right now is so depressing to be part of that unhealthy food is one of the few sources of pleasure I have right now.
Great idea. Let’s tackle obesity by making food more pricey for poorer people…
This is a problem, I’m on Universal Credit and I can see this act as a way of restricting access to people to food. The end result of that is starving people. And as I see it, potentially of those starving people, some might even die, or become malnourished.
People forget some people still live without refrigeration or cooking facilities. People living in bedsits or even immigrants living in hotels; for them a meal deal might be a fairly sound budgeting choice. About £3.50. And also we must factor in ability to cook.
From my own experience, a daily meal budget is only perhaps £5 on Universal Credit post-bills, actually slightly less. So a meal deal actually makes sense if that’s your only meal (not that I’m condoning that as a diet it’s woefully inadequate).
If the government wishes to decide on food policy, they should provide a calorifically and nutritional daily meal that anyone suffering in food poverty can access as an alternative as well as their policy at will. Food should be a universal basic human right. Leaving it to charity in a time when people will give less because of the economic constrictions is tantamount to murder because it’s so obvious what can happen. I’d rather have fat people than dead people.
The real question when considered democratically is when people are at the ballet box, how many poverty-stricken people are you willing to kill or let die. And in my opinion this might increase that number.
The real answer is to subsidize staples which are calorifically and nutritionally sensible or even as I think provide them free. Why is the fourth largest economy unable to provide food for everyone?
People need to take responsibility for their own health. Its ridiculous to ban unhealthy food
I’m sure if they looked at the eating habits of the obese people they were concerned with, they’d find some more obvious smoking guns than a chicken caesar wrap. Chip shops, 2litre bottles of coke, over-eating stuff that probably would have been fine in lower levels.
A sandwich, bottle of drink and a packet of crisps isn’t exactly a massive lunch.
Of course, instead fo actually educating people when it comes to nutrition, let’s just control every little thing, including meal deals. It’s getting to a point where it’s riddicolous.
If you’re going to mandate anything, at least make it a requirement for a meal deal to be healthy. Don’t allow crisps or chocolate bar (was absolutely gobsmacked when I moved to the UK and realised it’s a thing) and have a healthier option with a fruit which would be cheaper as opposed to more expensive. Instead of soda, have cheaper option with water. The meal deal in itself isn’t inherently bad, it’s how they’re made and advertised.
​
Actually having a cheaper option of a meal deal with water, sandwich and an apple instead of removing the meal deal option all together would be much more beneficial long term.
​
and if a person going to KFC is going to get a meal deal, they’re still going to get unhealthy amount. Instead of getting a drink there, they may just pop into a corner shop to get 2l bottle of soda which is cheaper and have even more sugar that a cup half filled with ice. Someone eating consistently at fast foods is not going to change their habits because meal deals are gone, they’re simply going to find a cheaper alternative.
This just targets low income people already struggling to eat, why not just provide everyone with fruit and veg if they are so insistent on health? Surely at a time when wages are stagnant, inflation is at ATH and virtually every source of food has risen by at least 10-15% they should be focusing on those issues instead of obesity? I don’t see the sense in this at all.
I can’t lie I actually don’t give a fuck if people want to eat shit, the tackling of obesity starts with getting to the root cause and working on those issues (I was obese, had a binge eating disorder, lost 5 stone- it’s not that they’re all just thick and lazy) not just banning things and treating the public like children.
I don’t even buy meal deals and this pisses me off.
All across Wales the occupants of trains starve to death as the only subsistence suitable for train travel is vanquished
So utterly stupid.. punishing the every day person because of a growing minorities inability to control their diet.. food isn’t the issue, nor is food pricing. It’s education.
Wouldn’t it just make more sense at this point to tax the over weight more.. punish those who it’s aimed at.
World has gone mad with all its acceptance.. plus size this and that.. next we will blame “sexy kids” for the existence of pedos..
Oh look, it’s the Nanny State looking to squeeze the working class even tighter.
the absolute most fatting meal deal you can get is like..what..600 calories? most softdrinks are already sugar free.
​
people will just go to greggs or maccys instead which is worse
​
also they are the saviour of physically demanding jobs
Always putting other prices up, never reducing the price of healthier alternatives. Just making it harder to be poor.
“I say Rupert. How can we make life more expensive for the peasants?”
“How about banning meals deals Tarquin?
“HAW HAW!” “SPOT ON OLD BOY!”
Oh yay banning deals on food in a time of crisis. Heres some advice to stop people actually being obese “have some fucking self control fatty!”
Why should I be punished because other people are addicts?
Ooo so that’s what they are doing with this cost of living issue in the uk. It’s to help remove meal deals from the shelves…make it more expensive to eat…nice one lads