Student finance: Remote learners left out of lifelong loan plans

6 comments
  1. Completely ridiculous. I’m in this grey area. I’m doing a full time OU course. It’s at least as much work as in person learning, and perhaps more given how much time I spend googling stuff that I could have answered by simply raising my hand in a real class.

    But for some reason, I don’t need living expenses, for the simple fact I do it online? I don’t understand the thinking other than “That’s a minority, and fuck minorities”.

  2. 4 years of loans per person. How would this work with 5 year sandwich courses? Maintenance loans?

    I’m guessing this is separate to the current student loan setup.

  3. Yet more Tory stupidity. No to remote in this day and age? *****

    It is also frustrating to see the four year cap, and the upper age limit being 60. I did my degree 30 years ago, and my Masters more than a decade past.

    I’m a prime candidate for new-skilling/re-skilling/up-skilling but will only have access to enough for a yearlong course. That’s hardly “lifelong”. If I’ve paid off a loan and want to take another, I should be able to do so … even if I’m 90!

  4. Well it’s only taken 12 years but the Tories have actually proposed a policy that has the possibility to improve my life. I think I need to go have a lie down.

    Although I don’t understand why students doing full-time remote learning won’t be eligible for maintenance loans, that just seems like counter-productive penny pinching.

  5. How is it an Engineering degree required 25+ contact hours a week where as some other courses were doing 6-8.

    Seems barmy to me. Who is subsidising who; what the hell are they paying for when theyre in for less than an hour a day?

Leave a Reply