Interesting comments from the judge in the Enoch Burke case,
Mr White SC: Enoch Burke was never required to hold any particular belief (by the school).
Judge: He was just required to refer to the child by a different name and pronoun?
Mr White SC: Precisely.
Judge: And what's so difficult about that?
— Frank Greaney (@FrankGreaney) March 31, 2023
4 comments
I clicked the link so you don’t have to – the comments are not interesting. Next
Where’s the interesting bit?
Mr White SC: Enoch Burke was never required to hold any particular belief (by the school).
Judge: He was just required to refer to the child by a different name and pronoun?
Mr White SC: Precisely.
Judge: And what’s so difficult about that?
Every so often I click into one of this wondering should I maybe give twitter another go.
Then I look at some of the replies and realise that no, I really don’t.
Fair play to the judge by the way. Delighted to see this family getting the pushback. There is absolutely nothing stopping them from practising their faith, and I will agree they should be allowed to do so as much as I find it despicable. They should not, however, be allowed to impose it on anyone else.