I don’t understand these guys… Is 4G allowed? Why is 5G the dangerous one?
Alleged by whom? What peer-reviewed studies published in reputable journals are they basing their assumptions on? The blog of an unemployed conspiracy theorist is not valid in any sense, yet it is all these people seem to have to back up their wild assertions.
Im sure the same shite was branded about around 4G
Even the high-frequency bands of 5G are microwaves, which are non-ionizing radiation, and don’t give you cancer unless you spend your day standing in front of a air defense radar.
Pretty sure just standing near busy traffic is way worse for them than 5g will ever be.
I’m just glad to see it’s not just the crazies in the US pushing this nonsense…I thought it is something environmental here causing problems…
Also if our phones are always connected to 5G does that mean that they’re always hackable and traceable?
It’s funny how government initially gave coverage to this conspiracy theory (because at the time Huawei was leading this technology) and now that the competition is down and under, people bought the narrative and still hanging on to it.
They could save themselves (and everyone around them) a lot of time by simply Googling ‘what is the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation’.
Not that they’d understand a fucking word of it, let’s be honest
Good, conspiracy theorists should not be allowed to waste the time of our already overstretched courts with frivolous lawsuits.
Government: “Yes, of course, we’ll warn everyone about the dangers of 5G”
Campaigners: “Fantastic”
Government: Publishes blank piece of paper. Later advises on the small risk of a 5G tower falling on someone in the event of a F9 tornado hitting the UK.
13 comments
I don’t understand these guys… Is 4G allowed? Why is 5G the dangerous one?
Alleged by whom? What peer-reviewed studies published in reputable journals are they basing their assumptions on? The blog of an unemployed conspiracy theorist is not valid in any sense, yet it is all these people seem to have to back up their wild assertions.
Im sure the same shite was branded about around 4G
Even the high-frequency bands of 5G are microwaves, which are non-ionizing radiation, and don’t give you cancer unless you spend your day standing in front of a air defense radar.
Pretty sure just standing near busy traffic is way worse for them than 5g will ever be.
I’m just glad to see it’s not just the crazies in the US pushing this nonsense…I thought it is something environmental here causing problems…
Also if our phones are always connected to 5G does that mean that they’re always hackable and traceable?
It’s funny how government initially gave coverage to this conspiracy theory (because at the time Huawei was leading this technology) and now that the competition is down and under, people bought the narrative and still hanging on to it.
They could save themselves (and everyone around them) a lot of time by simply Googling ‘what is the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation’.
Not that they’d understand a fucking word of it, let’s be honest
Good, conspiracy theorists should not be allowed to waste the time of our already overstretched courts with frivolous lawsuits.
Government: “Yes, of course, we’ll warn everyone about the dangers of 5G”
Campaigners: “Fantastic”
Government: Publishes blank piece of paper. Later advises on the small risk of a 5G tower falling on someone in the event of a F9 tornado hitting the UK.
This video gives a good insight into an anti 5G Protester [https://www.youtube.com/live/YlRM-ToSSz4?feature=share](https://www.youtube.com/live/YlRM-ToSSz4?feature=share)
My main concern with 5G is getting it where I live.